No, it’s not like stealing a physical item from a store.

“stealing” a digital copy of a movie, tv show or a game is like if the item you’re stealing from a store is infinitely copyable. Like the replicator from star trek…or that one episode of Sabrina the teenage witch with that box that can make a perfect copy of everything you put inside of it.

Of course I personally would never pirate anything, no matter how much streaming services increase their prices or how much they crack down on VPN usage to get around geo-restrictions, PIRACY IS BAD AND ONLY BAD PEOPLE DO IT.

I’ve never pirated anything in my whole life!

There are people who understand what I’m saying…but apparently most people don’t get it.

Of course that means I still would never pirate anything. That would be horrible to “steal” a copy of a movie or a TV show

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    No but i dont care

    I’ve been pirating for years. I just don’t want to pay for things

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    “stealing” a digital copy of a movie, tv show or a game is like if the item you’re stealing from a store is infinitely copyable.

    What if it’s a physical Blu-ray? Those are infinitely copyable.

    • Mr. Zeus@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      physical media is a physical finite item. digital media can be copied infinitely

      the reason why physical media is getting harder and harder to find is because the copyright nazis can’t control it. If they want to memory-hole a scene, they can’t change the content of that blu-ray disc with the original version on it

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’d make a point saying that there’s a personal moral and a broader societal understanding of morality, and they don’t always align.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I mean. I remember an article about an Amiga program that everyone used cracked, that only sold 1 copy. Sucks to be a small author in such a scenario.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    When you download music online for free and prevent the company from making a profit off of a creative work by the artist, that they prevented from making a profit & royalties, is that wrong? Doubtful. You can always send the artist money directly if you want to support them.

    • Mr. Zeus@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      the DMCA doesn’t protect the artists or any of the singers, it protects the shitty record labels and the money that the executives at those companies get

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    The only person stealing is the one who circumvents the DRM and shares it. It’s not stealing to see or hear something.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    The number of examples of media becoming unreachable to paying consumers keeps growing.

    Warner Brothers (Max) is the greatest example of this. Years of content from Cartoon Network just disappeared, leaving the consumer no legal avenue to enjoy some of their favorite shows.

    I do not advocate for piracy. I advocate for archiving.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 days ago

      I do not advocate for piracy. I advocate for archiving.

      Exactly. And if the assholes make it illegal for librarians, well then yo ho ho.

  • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    No, it’s not like stealing a physical item from a store.

    I’d argue stealing physical items from massive corporations is also morally acceptable. If you shoplift from a small mom & pop store, you’re actively hurting your community, however, if you shoplift from Wal-Mart, you’re actively hurting an entity which is hurting your community, therefore helping your community.

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Shoplifting from Walmart hurts my knees because the boss won’t believe that our onhand numbers are wrong and makes me check high and low before I can nil pick it 🥲

      This isn’t an ethical argument against shoplifting btw, this is an ethical argument in favor of nuking Walmart

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      12 days ago

      If you shoplift from a small mom & pop store, you’re actively hurting your community

      Unless you’re part of a riot, then it’s okay.

    • med@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Stealing sustinence from societal cancer is practically an immune response.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I mean, the replicator is making food out of SOMETHING. I’m guessing it’s some kind of waste produce from the engine room. It needs matter to operate. It can’t create ex-nihilo.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      The replicator from Star Trek makes matter out of pure energy, not out of other matter. It can make almost anything out of matter, so long as it has the molecular pattern on file, and the ship has enough energy available to power the replicators. That energy comes primarily from energy storage dedicated to replicator production, but in emergencies where a massive amount of matter need fabricated, additional power can be provided by the warp core.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        So they’re using several hiroshima’s or nagasaki’s worth of nuclear bomb’s energy to produce a cup of Earl Gray, hot? Seems like using garbage or human waste would save a lot of energy?

        Maybe I’m misunderstanding the power required to produce a small amount of matter?

        While we’re at it, is a transporter actually transporting me? Or is it technically really replicating me?

        Because what I assumed was happening was they essentially had a transporter like device that would take some matter (say a big pile of human dung) transport it (i.e, convert it into the atoms/energy/whatever the transporter uses run it through a pattern buffer that’s stored in the transporter for say, Earl Gray hot) and beam it into the Captain’s quarters as Earl Gray hot instead of poop.

        • ___@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          A cup of tea is around 500megatons if you convert all the matter into energy. We’re talking a few thousand Hiroshimas.

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I think conversion from matter to energy and back again seems extreme. Maybe it’s just matter to matter but something quantum level.

            • ___@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Do they use the replicator when they’re not moving? Maybe they’re just picking up some hydrogen along the way?

              Seems like high energy particles are easier to convert into new elements than low energy ones. Perhaps they’re transcribing uranium with the ingredients. Who knows.