Trying Plasma for a bit to see how green the grass is as a longtime Gnome user. The last time I ran Plasma on my main desktop was version 5.11, I think? It’s been a while…

  • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    So went frivolous, and installed KDE after years of Xfce.

    Wierd interactions everywhere, ctrl f4 doesn’t close windows, the terminal is called “Konsole” lol

    Would not recommend, i m going back.

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Funny thing, I used Xfce pretty much everywhere. When I recently had a work laptop I tried KDE seriously for the first time ever, and I was like, oh, this is just a sensible desktop nowadays.

      Clearly meant for nice hardware though. Sometimes a bit slow on my Raspberry Pi 4. Might switch back. But otherwise, no complaints.

      • arglebargle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lol ram usage. If you are trying to split hairs between KDE at about 800 mb and XFCE at 400 mb when a browser is going to hit you for at least a gig these days, I am not sure it matters that much.

  • devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    5 days ago

    Plasma is so good nowadays compared to some years ago. I remember suffering a lot in those early times too.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I love plasma. For the longest time there was just something that felt off about it and I could never get into it.

      Once I started using it with the steam deck I fell in love with it. Whatever visually thing irked me was gone and it’s such a good looking DE.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Plasma isn’t as visually polished as Cinnamon. Go ahead and get your clock and CPU temp widgets in the system tray the same font size and positioning.

      KDE feels a bit more cluttered because…I’ve said this before, KDE gives you every option under the sun, GNOME software isn’t designed to do anything unless you add extensions to enable features, and Cinnamon is somewhere in the happy middle.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Plasma isn’t as visually polished as Cinnamon.

        I’m pretty sure you can get Plasma to look and behave nearly identical to Cinnamon if you wanted.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I recently tried to do this because Cinnamon was pissing me off

          I gave up after ~6 hours over 3 days, Plasma Amish a beast

          Linux Mint 22.1 just came out with a new high DPI theme and some theme reworking and now my issues are fixed thank fuck

    • Dae@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      By default, both Plasma and Cinnamon have a very similar set up to Windows.

      However, Plasma is insanely modular and customizable, so if you’re willing to take the time to, you can make it look as much like Cinnamon as you please. Given how simple Cinnamon’s design is, I don’t think it would be hard at all.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    i hadn’t used kde (on my own systems) in over twenty years. i downloaded a bunch of ISOs over the last month or so, mainly looking to see what installs easiest and runs best on some old systems here. among them were several with plasma 6.

    one of those kinda ‘stuck’ in my head and i had to go back through several until i ‘found’ it again. been messing around with it now for a couple weeks trying to figure out what i’d want for a ‘working’ setup. might just end up switching one of my ‘working’ desktops over.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Takes literally minutes to try with 0 install and no risk for your data : https://distrosea.com/start/kubuntu-24.10-default/

    I’m not saying you should enjoy it (even though I do, Debian stable with Plasma for a while now) but it’s so convenient to give any distribution with any desktop environment a try that IMHO it’s wrong not to spend few minutes and see what you might be missing.

    • atmur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fedora/dnf makes installing additional desktops super easy, also with no risk to data. To hijack your comment a bit:

      To install Plasma: sudo dnf install @kde-desktop

      Logout and log into the Plasma session to use it.

      To rollback, get the transaction ID of the above: dnf history list

      And then rollback: sudo dnf history rollback <ID>

      If Gnome’s fonts/icons don’t revert, install and open gnome-tweaks and reset settings.

      • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think generally installing another DE on top of an existing one (assuming you already had one) is not recommended, as they might use some of the same config files and mess them up for each other.

        • probably2high@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          This is the first time I’ve heard of this, and I pretty much always have more than one DE installed and have never run into issues. Assuming you’re using a display manager (SDDM, LightDM, etc.), it should handle loading whichever graphical session at the time of login properly.

          edit: For clarity, what do you mean by “installing another DE *on top * of an existing one”–like kludging two DEs together in the same X/Wayland session? If so, that sounds like a horrible mistake that lead to that happening.

          • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean in a way where you’d get 2 different X/Wayland sessions to select in your login manager.

            I have also never run into issues doing this, just have always been told it’s a bad idea.

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              eh. only vaguely.

              basically, there might be some conflicts, such as a different icon theme being selected, but for the most part, things are fine - and most distros, uninstall is straightforward.

              one more significant issue you might run into is display manager changes. Gnome may not always play nicely with a kde display manager, and vice versa, regarding sleep, lock, etc. however, i think all of those issues are pretty much fixed these days.

            • probably2high@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Be free! Install all the DEs/WMs your heart desires.

              Regarding the multiple entries for X and Wayland versions of a particular DE: for the most part, I think xwayland has solved this, but as always–for better or worse–you have the freedom to go either way.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I used to be a huge fan of Gnome, back before they switched to whatever this mobile-first nonsense design is. Looks like something you would see on a tablet designed for children. They destroyed Gnome!

    • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Old gnome was great. Was like the best middle ground. Enough options to tweak stuff, but not plasma levels of knobs. Le sigh

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      The same. I used to love GNOME, now I’m forced to use KDE because GNOME 3+ is completely disgusting and unusable.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I use Cinnamon on my desktop to avoid the whole “modern” Gnome problem. It’s far better. But it’s Plasma all the way on my laptop baby!

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, Cinnamon is great, but I use Plasma myself. I got used to it after switching to Nobara, back in the day, but for most of the past year or two I’ve been using Bazzite and it defaults to KDE as well.

  • WiseWoodchuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m tired of fighting GNOME 3 to make it feel like GNOME 2. My next reinstall is going to be KDE. I just want a traditional desktop metaphor. 😩 Next major overhaul Kubuntu here I come!

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        And it’s still confining unless you add buggy addons that often crash after an update.

      • dufkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah, I think if you’re on e.g. Debian oldstable you could still be on Gnome 3. That’s not “long dead”.

    • atmur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah if you’re looking for a traditional/Windows-like metaphor, you’re WAY better off with Plasma than trying to wrestle Gnome into that shape.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Kubuntu has always been a buggy mess for me, might not be the best way to judge Plasma. Unfortunately, I think that’s where people develop their poor opinion of it from.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      You don’t even need to reinstall. You can have both at the same time and chose one or the other at each login.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I will never not up doot an Over the Hedge meme, so underrated in both meme ability and as a movie lmao

  • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    The couple of times I have decided to switch to Plasma I somehow get pulled back to GNOME. Like, I tried out earlier Plasma 5 on my system76 laptop and then s76 announced Pop!_OS. Then I tried again when I came across Nitrux which was essentially a heavily customized Plasma. Then I got a Librem 5 which uses phosh, based on GNOME.

    I really liked it though, and have thought about trying Plasma Mobile.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      confused about customization being allowed to customize anything…

      FTFY

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be fair customization is a good thing, the problem is it’s too easy to accidentally get into too advanced settings. It feels like the settings most people want 95% of the time are burried in the same place as the niche settings. The gnome tweaks app often gets criticized because it contains basic settings, but I think it could be beneficial for plasma to have the same thing. Only keep the base level user settings the the settings, and put all the customization stuff in a separate tweaks app. The simple by default, powerful when needed moto is true to some extent, but the simple by default part could be much improved and a lot more intuitive

      • Shifty Eyes@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        As a new linux user I was overwhelmed by plasma and all the choices. I much prefer an OS and DE that feels like it isn’t there and gets out of my way. It was all a bit too distracting, so I went back to Gnome like DEs (Cinnamon and now Cosmic).

        Something like your suggestion, with basic settings first and then a deeper layer or toggle for advanced settings would have kept me on the platform longer.

        • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I don’t understand. If you’re overwhelmed by settings just don’t open them? You don’t “need” them, like ever.

          • bastion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            it’s all stuff you need to sort through to get to the relevant settings you want. Some people aren’t there to learn to OS, they’re only there to use it.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah this shit is weird… I guess some people just see a lot of text and say “nope” without even bothering to read if any of that shit is actually necessary?

    • atmur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Ironically most of my customization so far has been to make it more like Gnome lmao

      Still trying to figure out how to make workspaces/virtual desktops more…usable.

      Overall though it’s amazing how solid Plasma is now, it sure as hell isn’t the buggy mess it used to be in the earlier Plasma 5 days.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I just installed a global theme to make it look like macOS 😄 loving it, have now a old unsupported macBookPro (2013) running latest macOS bootleg on latest Linux kernel 😆

        Love it!

      • AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        For me, i made it so pressing Super+<number> switches to that workspace.

        Super+Tab to toggle overview (Super+W by default)

        And a hot corner, which is set to trigger almost instantly, to toggle overview.

        • Mrb2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          I remapped my side mouse buttons to switching workspaces, and I absolutely love it.

          • nettle@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yea I did something similar on GNOME I mapped one of my mouse side buttons to be META and that way I could use it to access the overview and applications aswell as using side button + scroll wheel to switch workspaces.

            I love it so much I have implemented the same functionality In cosmic and would do the same in KDE.

        • probably2high@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Same here with the Super+<number> to switch (or equivalent function key if you use that binding for something else), and similarly Super+Shift+<same key used to switch to workspace> to send the current window to that respective workspace. For me, without the second one workspaces are waayy less productive.

            • probably2high@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Man, the Windows implementation of virtual desktops is beyond useless to me to the point of exponential loss of productivity. That’s probably my fault for thinking it’s the same use case as workspace switching in Unix–it’s really more like KDE’s Desktop Sessions feature, which is nice, but not really useful for my case.

      • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        For me i use 4 workspaces in a grid manner(2 rows) and switches with three finger swipes to whatever direction. Also four finger swipe up/down for overviews

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Still trying to figure out how to make workspaces/virtual desktops more…usable

        That’s a thing about gnome. The multiple desktops are great and easy to switch between. Especially on a laptop you can easily switch between them with the trackpad, or if you have, by using the touchscreen.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m a regular Gnome user. I love KDE’s activities. I don’t know if it’s still required, but Latte dock made it so that you had a nice dock with clean animations, dropping and adding your preferred shortcuts for whatever activity you’re currently on.

        I generally had three activities, work, general, and play. switch to work, and it looks like all I do on this computer is work. professional look and feel, all the relevant applications available in a clean autohide dock. switch to play, and it’s some sick background from anime or a game I’m currently into. Steam, Discord, Heroic, and various preferred games are the only visible icons on the dock. it’s really a pleasure to use.

        my problem is that when in Plasma, I miss Gnome’s overview, though, and whenever I switch back to Gnome, it just feels homey, functional, and straight to the point. Sure, I lose some customizations, but I gain in simplicity. Overall, that itself is a big customization choice - whether to use Gnome, KDE, or something else. …so I don’t regret Gnome’s lack of customizability, that’s just Gnome fulfilling is niche well. But Plasma is always a close second for me.