Now that the crowd has thinned. I have an open and honest question. Please do not take this as anything more than a thoughtful critique. I do see the value in forcing a person to question their views in a public forum. That being said.
What benefit is there to a satirical account that parrots the talking points of those in power?
Now that the crowd has thinned. I have an open and honest question. Please do not take this as anything more than a thoughtful critique. I do see the value in forcing a person to question their views in a public forum. That being said.
What benefit is there to a satirical account that parrots the talking points of those in power?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/17/facebook-fake-news-writer-i-think-donald-trump-is-in-the-white-house-because-of-me/
https://www.nydailynews.com/2016/06/19/majority-of-links-on-social-media-are-being-shared-without-users-actually-reading-them/
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/nov/08/donald-trump-comedians-parody-satire
Just because my views are different than yours doesn’t make me sarcastic or satirical.
Your comment history begs to differ
https://lemmy.world/comment/14773367
This is a valid and honest opinion you hold and are willing to defend?
@[email protected] in the interest of honest communication I’ve edited my comment.
It isn’t an unpopular view.
Did Winston Churchill not say that democracy is the worst form of government?
That’s not a defense of your position. That’s a quote out of context. Is this more of your satire?