Almost all the links in my front homepage are sponsored now. What’s next, a few ads in the bookmark bar? How about when I enter a URL, I then have to type “McDonald’s” before I can actually navigate there?

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the downvoters can’t hold these two thoughts in their mind at the same time:

    1. Firefox is the best browser.
    2. Firefox has serious problems because Mozilla is a terrible steward of it.
    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Let the people downvote. These points don’t matter. I turned off the visibility of points. I am immune, my morale is unbreakable. The downvoters have no power here!

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      Firefox is the best browser

      It’s only real competitors, in my eyes, are Firefox forks.

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      No it’s the complaint about one of the few transparent revenue flows Mozilla managed to pull off.

      It’s disabled one step deep on the settings

      There is a shitload of stuff going wrong with the Mozilla foundation and this doesn’t even make the top 10.

      That’s the reason for my down vote: it’s nothing I want this community to focus on. It’s basically engagement bait with the topic “ads bad”.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And Brave has significantly lower costs, given they don’t develop an own engine, but rather just put lipstick onto Chromium.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or, ya know, literally any other browser that’s not a fork of Firefox.

  • TxTechnician@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the best viable option for them is to either offer a subscription model. Or increase requests for donations.

  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If we want software to be FOSS we have to stop bitching so much about developers trying to make the math work.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      One could posit an ideal public sector development studio that takes grants from the state/federal government to produce useful Open Source software. Think public radio or public broadcasting, but for apps.

      Hell, it isn’t even wild in the current moment. Modern day AWS and Azure subsidize much of its small/new user client base with the massive public sector clientele. OpenAI and DeepSeek are both the product of giant state-sponsored initiatives to develop AI that is free at point of service. Plenty of the original internet architecture was the product of public investment and grants, as was the university-centric ARPNET that would eventually be commoditizated into the commercial World Wide Web.

      Look up the history of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications and the pioneering of Mosaic, the first widely available GUI-based web browser. It was the foundation for both Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator, which licensed the original design for the tiniest fraction of what it would ultimately generate in future revenues.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Was trying to reference this

      Maybe I should have added a paragraph somewhere in there. I was typing fast because I only get so much time on my break at work.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Your writing is better than serviceable, I just had a brain fart while reading it

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And even if you disable this, your address bar still randomly breaks, but instead of suggesting an ad it just doesn’t suggest anything.

      Fuck you, Mozilla.

  • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Honestly, I don’t care. I don’t even look at that stuff, I just type in the bar thing what I want. Mozilla has to fund the project somehow.

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So how exactly were you planning on them making money if they don’t take money from Google to be the default search engine and they don’t take money to place advertisements on the default home page?

    • themusicman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Open source projects shouldn’t have “making money” on their priority list. I would donate to Mozilla if I had some guarantee that my money would actually fund Firefox development

        • themusicman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m not one of those people, and to be clear I support for-profit companies open sourcing code. Mozilla is a unique case where donations are a tiny fraction of their income and Firefox development is a tiny fraction of their expenses. I just want to donate directly to the parts I care about (Firefox, MDN).

  • lemmylurkaround@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    See ads, “how dare they” Sees paid version, “how dare they” Development costs time and money, pick your poison.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I was okay with the sponsored links, but now this is affecting the functionality of the app. My phone is shit and I have a hard time sliding to the next page.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        but now this is affecting the functionality of the app

        This shit irks me so much, because it keeps happening!

        There’s this feature that makes your address bar randomly auto complete sponsored URLs instead of your actual history. Pretty fucking annoying to type n and have Netflix pop up, even though I don’t use it.

        When you disable this “feature”, it still breaks your autocomplete! Now instead of suggesting Netflix, it just sometimes doesn’t suggest anything before I continue typing.

        If you must add these anti-features to pay for your CEO, at least don’t break the app when it’s disabled!

          • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Eh, the criticism isn’t invalid - those are still ads being added on the front page. What does irk me is people talking about how something breaks their workflow, yet they don’t even try to fix the issue.

        • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Are they going to give me a link to a version that doesn’t do this? Otherwise what exactly am I paying for?

          • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            How has no one in this thread put together that you can literally just customize your home page, removing categories until it’s literally blank, or only keeping pages you select available.

            Git good noobs.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’m not really sure what you’re getting at?

          I understand that my circumstances are unusual but I would absolutely pay $20 a month without a moment’s hesitation.

          I would pay $50, but I’d really have to believe in the project.

          It’s worth noting that presently mozilla earns $0 from my not using google, and not seeing sponsored tabs.

          • Ferk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            It’s worth noting that presently mozilla earns $0 from my not using google, and not seeing sponsored tabs.

            I thought Google pays (or paid?) Mozilla just to be the default engine out the box, regardless of whether you change it or not.

            Another point is that it’s so easy to turn those things off (the sponsored shortcuts too) that I wonder if it would be worth the cost of launching an alternate version behind a paywall while making sure it works only for people who pay (which could be seen as DRM anyway, with potentially massive backslash). So I imagine the end result would not be that profitable (whether they decide to paywall it properly or not). Those who wanna donate and have no ads can do that already, those who want a cleaned up version of Firefox can have that and from neutral and independent third parties which I’d argue is better than if it were Mozilla who did it (and you can donate to Mozilla while using those too)… so I’m not sure it would make sense.

            But it would make sense to have a donation pool specifically to fund Firefox development. That would be something interesting, considering Mozilla does other things besides Firefox. But I expect they don’t do that because they probably fear all donations will move there and they don’t want to lose funds for other things. We might need to create a separate organization if we want an independent fund for Firefox-based browsers.

            • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              You might be right about Googles agreement with Mozilla. I had assumed it would be based on the number of searches performed with a mozilla user agent but that’s just a guess.

              I’m not sure why exactly but I just feel very uncomfortable with the idea of donating to Mozilla. I absolutely believe in the importance of Firefox’ existance, and if I felt I was contributing to that then I would donate. I think with the situation as it is making a donation would feel a bit like voting - my own contribution isn’t going to effect the outcome, and I don’t really agree with mozilla’s behavior anyway.

              On the other hand, if Mozilla declared that they were going to spin off a separate org exclusively to develop and maintain firefox, and would have no ongoing relationship with google nor advertising of any kind, would focus on privacy, and were going to survive entirely on subscriptions, I feel like that’s something I could get behind and feel happy to contribute.