• markstos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    My town’s subreddit just started a policy to disallow links to X for similar reasons.

    There is a movement to avoid the platform.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    The reasoning behind this move is said to be X/Twitter not being in line with Debian’s shared values

  • hulfpa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Now I wish they had an ARM Qualcomm distro. Been hoping for a Linux distro for my Snapdragon X Elite machine. Now Debian had taken a stand for something they will probably be my distro once there is Linux support for my machine!

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Debian already has an ARM version. Do you mean some Qualcomm drivers are missing? There are already Ubuntu ROMs for Android phones, so this shouldn’t be an issue, right?

      • hulfpa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There are ARM distros, yet the SnapDragon X Elite SOC is not yet supported fully. The drivers are a mess. They are progressing, but slowly probably due to the small number of people who would use it.

      • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Arm is insanely fragmented, every device must be have dedicated drivers and hardcoded specific configuration in the kernel. And sometimes even separate kernel builds. Also Snapdragon X devices are not even fully supported upstream in the most recent kernel yet. Which means they are many years away from being supported in Debian. Unless someone makes a fork of Debian with latest kernel and not yet upstreamed Qualcomm specific patches (which how these “arm distros” are usually made).

  • nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    12 hours ago

    shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    It actually is a perfectly sensible move, and it doesn’t “shut out” anyone. If anything, prioritizing twitter is what shuts users out. They linked to two-three alternatives. What’s the argument here, exactly, from the other side?

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    i am keeping a record of what just what it took, before people got off.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Yeay, Debian user here who also left Twitter/X for similar reasons. I was already on Mastodon and Bluesky but didn’t make a habit out of it. Leaving the bad platform entirely (and having my data archived and searchable) helped a lot.

    Glad to hear they moved on!

  • That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    22 hours ago

    As it turns out, having an account on a social media platform full of Nazis, violent racists, and child diddlers is not good for business.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Personally, I think that the discussion around this will evolve as the news spreads, but I agree with Robert on this one. Sure, X/Twitter has become a less welcoming place than before, but shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    Nah, I think I’m cool if Debian doesn’t respect the input of Nazi sympathisers.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, that section is bad.

      For one, it’s has classic vibe “if you want to keep the nazis out, you’re the one who’s exclusionary”.

      But also, how is refusing to engage on a platform “shutting out a significant portion of [the] community”? That sounds backwards to me. Blocking people from engaging with Debian on its own platforms would be shutting them out. The implication in the article is that Debian is obligated to be unconditionally present on every social platform its users might be on.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The other twist is, unlike Xitter, you don’t have to create an account on Mastodon to be able to read their feed. You can access it like any other website. So nobody is getting shut out. They’re just posting elsewhere, where anyone can read it.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You don’t even have to go to the website. Every Mastodon feed can be accessed via RSS. You just have to add “.rss” to the end of the URL.

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            That’s a super neat trick actually. Why the heck has RSS been losing popularity when it seems to be the only magic protocol you really need to keep up with what you actually care about?

            Oh I just answered my own question: It must be harder to hijack RSS with intrusive ads and clickbait…

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah what the fuck is with that.

      It’s a very twitter centric view of the web. If you’re not on xitter you’re “shutting out a significant portion”.

      The thing is, it’s not simply that Musk has an ideology that is disparate from my own, he has an agenda that is egregiously contrary to the stated values of the Debian project.

      You’d consult with the community over a new logo or blog layout maybe, but on whether to assist Musk in his far right agenda there’s not really any decision to be made honestly.

  • JoshCodes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 day ago

    I keep making the incorrect assumption that everyone has already left X. Just seems common sense we’ve hit all hands abandon ship

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Never underestimate the network effect and how reluctant people are to move to another social network. The masses just follow the crowd, so every big account moving out from there helps take more users away.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There are lots of brands and people still on X and try to justify it with hand waving.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        ok, that’s just hilarious :P

        The equivalent of IE being the last one to move to the fediverse lol

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      It is depressing, but I try not to forget we are seeing a sort of survivorship bias of stupidity on the former Twitter at this point. The cohort of remaining posting accounts is dumber and dumber on average. And this dynamic is magnified in the replies, because they are paid blue accounts at the top. Eg, self-selected losers. (The top account has likely just hidden their checkmark)

      Edit: PS, are you still using Nitter? I thought it had died?

      • IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        This is to me one of the major reasons Twitter discourse is completely ruined and the platform is mostly useless for seeing what people think now.

        When the only people who get to be at the top of discussions are people who pay for twitter, the only opinions that get shared are those that are pro Twitter, pro Elon, etc. Because they have a direct stake in the game.

        And that’s if the accounts posting aren’t all bots that pay for a checkmark to boost engagement, which is almost all I see when I occasionally have to check Twitter these days.

        So glad more people are leaving it. There’s nothing to gain from it anymore.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Ah, that captures such a stark answer to why people use xitter though.

      It’s not “so I can hear from you” it’s “So YoU cAn HeAr FrOm Us!!!11oneone”

      Walled gardens? More like prison yard. Lol

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That first reply highlights a major difference in how people approach the world.

      Speaking very generally, conservatism and right wing politics seen to attract those who see everything as a competition and that dominating other people is what it means to be a good person. Funny that it also leads to frustrated, angry, isolated people.

      So if we want to switch to using a website that doesn’t promote hurting/killing 2% of the population, we are now BOWING DOWN to the minority some of us would not rather murder.

      It’s the same reason they hate DEI so much.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Honestly I had the same thought. But on the other hand, internet outrage talking points have also become extremely formulaic…