• Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Alternative voting methods have proven useless against capitalist power. Countries like Australia and Japan use them, and it does nothing. It might make candidate stacking a little more expensive, and they have to pay more to advertise their candidates, but that’s it.

          • Itsapersonn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Alternative voting methods allow for smaller parties, ones who’s values may align more with the general population, an actual fighting chance. You gotta admit at some point that having only two realistic choices is a bit of a problem, right?

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It seems like it should help, but in practice, its been useless. You end up having a greater diversity of candidates and parties, but if capital still stands above the political system and controls it, it just means more capitalist puppets, and more advertising money required to get those preferred puppets elected.

              Multi-party Bourgeois parliamentarism is not really any different from the ancient roman imperial senate. Its government by oligarchy / the wealthy entrenched class.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              In current Polish sejm there is 17 parties and 42 indpendents (on 460 seats). But every single one of them is procapitalist, proimperialist, pro USA, anticommunist. Alternative voting methods do literally nothing by itself.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ranked Choice Voting is both too ineffective to make any change, and too difficult to get in the first place. It’s the perfect endless carrot on a string, the eternal “just one more lane and traffic will be gone.”

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Even if that’s so, you’d still need to vote for the people on the right, because voting third party in first past the post is objectively just terrible for everyone with similar goals.

      • Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Last time I checked, that’s not how that works, everyone has a wide range of ideals and views. Not 1 or 2, there can be 1 1/2, 1 1/3, 1 1/10000, whatever