• Grostleton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Same, I was under the impression that this was fairly common knowledge, but it’s good to have it openly announced by some authority on the matter.

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It gets messed up when downloading files onto a slow smb share but that’s mostly my bad

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      My only gripe was that it doesn’t handle (unencoded) spaces in a URL name, which is probably correct behavior but they’re in the titles of torrents on some sites, so I’d have to manually edit them each time. I ended up just using qBT.

  • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    if I still downloaded directly to my local drive, I’d use utorrent BUT only the 2.2.1 version. it’s been at least 4 years since I’ve done that due to a lack of having a functional laptop so I’ve been out of downloading stuff that way for years, but even then I knew that modern utorrent was bad. I actually stopped using any new version once bittorrent bought it.

  • richmondez@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    4 days ago

    If it keeps newcomers from making mistakes in client choice it looks like a good thing to me?

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why torrent when you can use newsgroups? No need to seed, just download and done. Haven’t torrented for 10 years.

      • Psiczar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, but not a massive amount. I pay annually and it works out to about $7-8 a month for 50mbps of bandwidth and unlimited downloads. Then use *arr apps and sabnzbd to manage everything.

          • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes? If I could get everything in one place then I would happily pay for that. I don’t pirate to save money. Saving money is just a nice sideeffect. I pirate because it’s literally more convenient than juggling 15 different services.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I mean, I don’t use the service but, $7-8 a month that gives you access to everything versus 14 to $16 a month per streaming service on everything else. It sounds like they’re still getting a steal at a more convenient rate.

            Being said, yeah there is plenty of free options that could be being done as well so there is that argument

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean it’s completely valid if you find that to be a better deal than torrenting, but I can use my full 500 mbps bandwidth for free.

          • Xanza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It depends on how you look at it.

            You pay for your internet. Isn’t that you paying to pirate?

            If it is then it’s only a factor of cost. He pays slightly more for Usenet access and internet access and then he pirates.

            If it’s not then it’s not a factor of cost and it’s only a factor of pedantism.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I need to have access to the Internet anyway. In fact, having it makes me a decent amount of money. You could say it costs me negative several thousand euros a month. Piracy or scrolling Lemmy is a bonus.

              Getting Usenet means additional cost, but the only benefit is piracy. Therefore, it’s paying to pirate.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Depends on how much you download. You can pay a once-off payment for a block of data and it lasts indefinitely. I’ve got a 5TB block I’ve had for over 10 years. I think it was maybe $25 when I got it?

        Edit: If you need more data, there’s plans with unlimited data for a few dollars per month.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they would support a client like Rain I would actually switch to the *arr stack.

    • American_Jesus@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t need to support every client, if the client supports folder monitor you can use blackhole

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I honestly couldn’t say how long. I know I was late to the party on knowing what was going on but even I moved on from it a long time ago now.

        • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          i used utorrent until a few years ago when i started caring enough to switch. old habit, like over 15 years ago when my mom taught me how to pirate, utorrent was good back then. don’t know why i kept using it for that long, i even had to block ads in it by editing the hosts file…

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think it just comes down to habit and wanting to keep things simple. The adage “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” exists for a reason, after all. I never even bothered going as far as to trying block the ads. They suddenly appeared for me one day but would never render, the panels just kept flashing at me. It might have been while looking up a fix - I can’t remember - but it was around that time that I also heard about the undisclosed mining issue so I quickly jumped ship. Been happily using qbittorrent ever since and now wouldn’t really be able to swap again thanks to finding a proper dark mode theme for it. So few others seem to have it and I have no idea what I’m doing with theme creation.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s the default included with Ubuntu but they (Ubuntu) haven’t updated it to be the latest released version. You have to add their PPA.

      I switched over to qbittorrent for better control over what happens after the files download a few years ago.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yepp, been using it for years. Lots of third party app support and a minimal web interface to add a new 🧲🚢 in a hurry

      Definitely does not have any bells and whistles though, doesn’t bother me but is a dealbreaker for some.

    • aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are other options such as qbittorrent or deluge though I would not recommend deluge due to IP leaks and it hasn’t been updated since 2022

    • Shirogane Ryu@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      For me the best are:

      • Qbittorrent
      • Transmission QT
      • Ktorrent
      • Deluge

      Special mention: BiglyBT Fork of Azureus without the shit of Azureus

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh there’s the other person who remembers the original Azureus!

        Okay I’m kidding, it was fairly popular before it became Vomit… I mean Vuze. After it went to shit I bounced around till I found utorrent and then a bit later Transmission, Deluge and now Qbittorrent in a container.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s not bad but it’s pretty bare. A lot of people like their bells and whistles these days.

      Edit: Changed the wording to be less broad for all the “But I…” specials.

        • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Then enjoy. It just isn’t for a lot of people. You have helped as a statistic to the original question though.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Does Transmission let you force the use of a specific connection?

          For example, qBittorrent lets you choose your VPN as its only allowed connection so that you can’t accidentally use your regular network when not connected to the VPN.

          • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Hi! Could you give me some details or a link that describes how to do that? I’d like to harden my install. Thank you! :)

            • SatyrSack@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              in qBittorrent: Tools > Options > Advanced > Network Interface. That dropdown box should list things like your Wi-Fi connection, Ethernet connection, etc., including an option that sounds like your VPN provider. If you run into troubles, do an Internet search for “qbittorrent network interface” for various articles and guides.

            • moody@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              In the settings panel, the Advanced section has a setting for network interface, with a drop down menu of your available network devices. Your VPN connection should appear as a separate device in the list. If you choose that, it will only send data through that device, so if you’re not connected, it has nowhere to send data to.

              The github only has a description of the setting, and doesn’t really explain it any more than that.

          • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Never thought of that. In my use case, Transmission is running in a container on my server, so it only ever has one connection, and VPN and traffic management happens on my router.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Isn’t it as simple as exporting all torrents as .torrent files, importing them in qB, then pointing qB to the same downloads folder?

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Some people have torrents across various directories or even renamed files in them (yes, it’s possible and useful for crossseeding between trackers with different naming schemes). Of course, this makes migration way more difficult.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    uTorrent’s brand recognition is crazy, it’s been crap for years and it still the name people who don’t torrrent often recognize.
    Nice change, good to steer the novices away from that junk.

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s so ubiquitous that for about a second I thought wait what I thought that was the good one until I remembered that I’ve been using qBittorrent for a decade.

      For a time, it just was the client.