Asking after the privacy debacle and manifest. I’m not keeping up closely, but iirc Firefox is the browser recommended because of Ublock. After the privacy data issue I’ve noticed broken trust from Firefox users, recommendations in favor of switching browsers, and predictions saying Firefox is going downhill fast and that their forks won’t be maintained for much longer.

So I’m here asking the seasoned sailors’ thoughts, aye. Is this just a storm passing by or are you really considering jumping ship?

  • mesa@piefed.socialEnglish
    24·
    2 days ago

    Links2 is obviously the best browser. #links2gang

    But librewolf is pretty neat.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.netEnglish
        4·
        2 days ago

        I just tried now for the first time and no it doesn’t crash when I press “customize homepage”.

          • three@lemm.eeEnglish
            4·
            2 days ago

            According to the devs vanadium is preferred for security, something about Firefox not having comparable sand boxing (?). Not sure, they wrote in length about the reasoning but at a certain point my eyes started glazing over.

            I’ve been using Firefox for a long time on desktop and mobile, so when I switched to graphene I just kept with it.

            I may try to switch over to vanadium though seeing as I’m already in “switching” mode.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nlEnglish
              1·
              13 hours ago

              I tried Vanadium when the install was fresh. The adblocking is just not that good… For example, on one of the sites it blocked the ads, but left out the giant HTML elements they used to be in.

          • LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
            2·
            1 day ago

            If you use android, GOS or not, you are using chromium webview anyhow. So using a Firefox browser is just adding on. There is no way around that issue until a proper non chromium WebView is available (gecko is not). But before that happens we will more likely have decent linuxphones instead of android. Vanadium is way more secure than any other browser , only competition would be bromite, also chromium based. Firefox on mobile is light-years behind vanadium security wise, no excuse for not sandboxing. https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

    • Jinx@lemmy.caEnglish
      1·
      16 hours ago

      Same, I’m done with Firefox / Mozilla…
      Librewolf, Waterfox, Floorp seem like viable options.

  • Arfman@aussie.zoneEnglish
    7·
    21 hours ago

    It seems the alternatives are worse but I’m definitely trying out one of the Firefox forks

  • kevincox@lemmy.mlEnglish
    201·
    2 days ago

    I still recommend it. I’m not fully happy with the situation but for now I consider it my best option.

    1. I consider Chromium-based browsers out of the question as they give too much power to Google. This is already showing to be a problem with new APIs and “features” that Google is pushing into the web platform and the bigger the market share gets the more control they have.
    2. Web browsers are the biggest attack surface that most people have. Displaying untrusted webpages and running untrusted code is incredibly difficult and vulnerabilities are regularly discovered. I don’t yet know a Firefox fork that I trust enough to reliably respond to security vulnerabilities quickly and correctly.

    So for now I am staying with raw Firefox. Not to mention that as a disto-built Firefox I have some insulation from Mozilla’s ToS. But I am very much considering some of the forks, especially the ones that are very light with patches and are mostly configuration tweaks.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.orgEnglish
          2·
          17 hours ago

          Can we stop acting like he raised a Nazi salute or something? Denying a PR that only changes minor stuff like pronouns by a not known contributor is well within the rights of a maintainer. Just because he did not communicate it well doesn’t make him or the project transphob

          • Ilandar@lemm.eeEnglish
            1·
            2 hours ago

            It’s way less egregious than the Brave co-founder making donations in support anti-gay marriage amendments, and even that has been massively overblown (the real reasons to avoid Brave are a) Chromium, b) shady crypto stuff and c) its financial incentives as a for-profit company with investor backing to compromise on its claimed ethical principles). I’m getting so sick of these purity tests on completely irrelevant and unrelated issues standing in the way of genuine alternatives to big tech. People are so eager to let perfect be the enemy of good.

    • matey@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      4·
      2 days ago

      as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM

      Do they just try to remove DRM from media as it comes down, or can you not watch any DRM media at all on it?

  • Yozul@beehaw.orgEnglish
    30·
    2 days ago

    I’m not interested in anything based off Chromium, and I don’t really like the idea of going with a Firefox fork much either. You’re not only trusting them to actually care about your privacy and security, and you’re not even just trusting them to actually catch and fix all of Mozilla’s shenanigans as well. You are also trusting them to constantly stay on top of all the latest security patches. There aren’t really any Firefox forks I trust with all 3 of those things at once. Even if there was, there are certainly no forks of Firefox that have anything even remotely close to the capacity necessary to maintain a web engine on their own, so you’re still trusting Mozilla to keep Firefox updated and secure for your fork of choice to even have a chance.

    Until a new browser with a new engine comes along that actually lets me use the full uBlock Origin there’s not really any other option besides Firefox that makes sense. At least to me.

  • DARbarian@fedia.io
    242·
    2 days ago

    Nope. LibreWolf & Waterfox are top-tier, Zen and Mullvad Browsers aren’t bad at all

    • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      7·
      2 days ago

      I will say as nice as Zen seems (I agree that it’s not bad), I don’t really like the whole “vertical tabs” shtick. I mean, I can see why some people would like that, but personally I never got into it. It just looks weird to me and I like seeing more of my tab names (weirdly enough that’s exactly what a lot of pro-vertical users claim is good about them lol).

      Also, from a privacy standpoint, not a huge fan personally of the fact that unlike LibreWolf, Zen Browser doesn’t have ResistFingerprinting enabled by default (not sure if it’s even in there tbh).

      • quickenparalysespunk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        4·
        2 days ago

        i agree with wanting see more of tab title. for people who regularly keep 50+ tabs open, that is a pipe dream.

        if tabs are so many that their iconized anyway, making the tab bar vertical and iconized isn’t much difference.

        and if the bar would expand on hover (hopefully in near future), like in Brave (not sure if it’s a Chrome feature), then it can be wide enough to see plenty of title without reducing the webpage size most of the time.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.mlEnglish
    24·
    2 days ago

    Firefox with like 10 different settings checkboxes unticked through its settings to disable phoning home, prevent sponsored suggestions, prevent recommendations, etc. + ublock origin extension installed, obviously.

    It used to be just an install and go ordeal. Now you have to have all these caveats. I used to send technical and interaction to Mozilla but given their terms changes I can’t be confident in them with even that much information anymore.

    Final thought is I don’t see what Mozilla’s endgame is. It costs a lot of money to develop a competitive and impactful web browser, I understand that much. Where are they supposed to get their money from? Well. I don’t get paid millions a year to solve this problem, but it seems pretty obvious the current leadership have made their minds up to make Firefox yet another advertisement browser.