• rImITywR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 days ago

      Does it use just standard watch bands? It looks like it, but I didn’t see it mentioned.

      One of the things I find ridiculous about other smart watches is that they use proprietary bands. When I found out that people are paying $60+ for a silicon band for an Apple watch, it blew my mind. Also that people put screen protectors or cases on their Apple watches because their $500+ watch doesn’t even have a crystal lens, and is prone to scratching.

      • junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is that typical? I guess Apple sells watch bands at that price, but I’ve never bought a $60 Apple branded watch band. With the ubiquity of Apple Watches it’s not hard to find inexpensive Apple Watch bands even if they are proprietary. I don’t think that’s the case for other smartwatches, though.

        • SoulSkill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          We will see, unless there is an “official” announcement of some sort for the exacts contents of that github repo prior to preorder closing.

          The current README contents do not do justice.

  • mac@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    If it’s open source, could someone potentially develop an app for it to control devices in home assistant? Would love to be able to control my room lights from my watch, and don’t think it’s possible on my Xiaomi watch fit 3 connected to gadgetbridge.

    I recognize that there would also need to be work done in the app to support this as the watch only supports BLE

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    How are they allowed to give it the exact same name as an Intel CPU line?

    I’ve got a Core 2 Duo around here somewhere…

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Man I might have to get one of these…I don’t mind my FitBit, but since being gobbled by Google, I don’t need another data point for Google to feed off.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    My GearS3 finally kicked it, after 8 years, and my other watch is even older than that, so the more premium rePebble is actually quite appealing. If i decide to get an update, i’m still debating looking at something like the Garmin Vivoactive though

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I have a Garmin Instinct and I can definitely recommend their hardware, but their mobile app to link for notifications and health stats is flaming hot garbage and never actually worked for me.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wait, the basic version has a compas and barometer without a heart rate monitor, but the more expensive one has a heart rate monitor and no barometer or compass? Why?

    • taanegl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Because that’s the feature people actually want. The biggest use of these watches is having an active heart rate monitor, as evident by even most of the cheaper watches having them.

      Pebble is now playing a gambit, whereby they think they will sell more of the premium model to people who will be using it for exercise and health reasons.

      Either that, or the hardware chosen specifically separates the heart rate monitor so that vendors strike a better deal with the factories to get specially designed chips.

      Either way, someone is getting taken for a ride.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Pebble is now playing a gambit, whereby they think they will sell more of the premium model to people who will be using it for exercise and health reasons.

        There’s an explicit line in their site that says these are not made to be fitness trackers, and that garmin are good for that (or some other brand, can’t remember). It would be very odd to say that if it was their target.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Dammit, I wanted to use this as a fitness tracker like garmin

          Edit: found this

          Software features

          Each watch runs open source PebbleOS. This enables all the baseline Pebble features like receiving notifications, timeline, watchfaces, alarms, timers, calendar, music control, basic fitness tracking, etc.

          You’re looking for a fitness or sports watch. That’s not what we’re making. From what we hear, Garmin watches are great for runners/cyclists/triathletes!

          https://ericmigi.com/blog/introducing-two-new-pebbleos-watches/

          • smayonak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            For fitness its probably decent but Garmin seems to have placebo sleep tracking. In order to get anything remotely accurate the sleep tracking algorithm has to be compared to a lot of polysomnograph data. But because companies don’t want to spend any more than they need to sleep tracking is usually just tacked on. Garmin hasn’t shown a good track record in this regard.

      • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because that’s the feature people actually want. The biggest use of these watches is having an active heart rate monitor, as evident by even most of the cheaper watches having them.

        Seriously, even my $30 PineTime has a heart rate monitor.

        I’ve never once used a compass on my watch, mostly because the phone it’s attached to is a much better compass and even has its own barometer built-in. Plus it’s a pain to use a compass on a watch because you have to hold your whole arm up.

  • Pondis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I really wanted a Pebble when they first came out, and then REALLY wanted one when they were selling for next to nothing when FitBit bought the company.

    I love a smart watch, but hate the daily charging. Im currently wearing a fossil hybrid which has an eink screen under the hands, and I love that it lasts 30 days on a charge, but wish it did more.

    So I ordered a Core 2 Duo. I might still cancel the order before December, but no other watch does what I want, and this is the closest.

  • moonburster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was really excited, but the price is steep compared to the Garmin watches. I currently own an instinct 2. That one gets me between 15 to 18 days of battery and that’s in winter time. In the summer it is longer due to the small solar panel in it. I guess I’ll wait for the reviews and take some nights of sleep on them

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m pretty excited about this; my Pebble Time was the best watch I’ve even owned - smart or otherwise.

    That said, I don’t think I’m going to be preordering this given how badly the last Pebble Kickstarter went. For those who weren’t around at the time, Pebble (whose CEO is behind this venture) built his whole business around Kickstarter. The first 2 generations were wildly successful, but for the third generation they massively overextended themselves trying to get hardware into mainstream retailers, prioritised building stock for retail channels (because contracts) and ran out of cash before shipping for the majority of backers who had bankrolled this whole thing. Eventually everyone who hadn’t had their orders fulfilled got a refund, but that was only because FitBit decided to buy them. Eric seems like a nice guy and great at the technology - and I’m not saying that I could run a business any better - but I think I’ll wait until there is stock on hand for me to buy outright before I hand over my cash

      • Master167@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ditto, even though I’m in the market to replace my smartwatch since the buttons fell off.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      From their FAQ, emphasis mine:

      You shouldn’t get one if…

      You need a perfectly polished smartwatch. This project is a labour of love rather than a startup trying to sell millions of watches. There may be some rough edges (literally). Things will get delayed. Some features will not be ready at launch. Things could break. Things could not last as long as you’d like. The only thing we can guarantee is that it will be awesome and a lot of fun! Every time you look down at your watch, you will smile

      So yeah, I’d say your take is pretty accurate. At least they’re honest lol

      • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        My concern isn’t that things will get delayed, it’s that I’ll give them my money and get nothing in return

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s. Uh… the entire idea of a kickstarter.

          It may crash and burn. Don’t want that, don’t back anything on kickstarter.

          • Bunbury@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Honestly that is something I’ve always been ok with on Kickstarter. But it’s 50% scams now of people who never intended to deliver anything in the first place and Kickstarter is taking a lot of steps to protect the scammers in this. The only reason I ever back anything on there anymore is because of campaigns by companies I trust will at least try. I trust Pebble will try, so I personally am very tempted.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The idea is that you judge each Kickstarter venture on its likelihood of doing that vs actually delivering.

        • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Understandable, which is why I’m choosing to not preorder. However, they also have a full refund policy that’s good until your unit is being prepared to ship, and several notifications leading up to that point. One of the best ways to handle preorders I’ve encountered.

    • dumples@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I always feel nervous preordering anything. I got a new Fitbit so I think I have some time before it fails so I can see how this rePebble works out. If it is as good as it looks I might just get it. 30 day estimated battery life is amazing

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      He also screwed a lot of the employees on the way out from Pebble, and he also bailed on Beeper the minute it got complicated. Sold it to Matt Mullenweg a year or two after getting pimp-slapped by Apple because he had no real plan for what to do if Apple started banning the devices he was using as Matrix bridges. He gave up after like three days, it was honestly genuinely pathetic. This was a paid service and he fucked it all up for anyone using iMessage on it.

      I have personal experiences with Beeper that make me less than trust Eric Migicovsky, and I really don’t think he seems like a “nice guy.” He actively sucks, doesn’t have plans for sustainability and then sells it all off to someone else at a personal profit while the people doing the actual work get fucked out of a job.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I was very excited when Beeper was first announced and I got on the wait list.

          I finally got onboarded, and this was when you still had be walked through the setup by one of the Beeper employees.

          I got into the Zoom meeting, and got a warning that it was going to be recorded. I had not, up to that point, had ever been disclosed that it was going to be recorded. I declined to join the meeting and sent a follow-up email with some pertinent privacy related questions, especially since in the case of some of the Bridges that were being used for this service essentially meant Beeper would have access to my credentials. They would later create a more secure system, but it was not very secure early on.

          My main question regarded Micigovsky’s past in selling Pebble and I asked what gaurantees of the privacy policy were being made in regard to a potential sale of the company (considering it eventually got sold, I guess a good question to ask), and what, if any, promises were being made for the privacy policy to stay unchanged through a sale.

          I never got a response to my questions. Not being told I was going to be recorded, and not ever getting an answer to reasonable privacy policy questions led me to never signing up for the service.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Beeper is an instant messenger software that enables using a variety of chat services and protocols all from the same application. It was created in 2020 by Eric Migicovsky, Brad Murray and Tulir Asokan

        On December 5, 2023, the company released Beeper Mini, an Android app that can send messages through Apple’s iMessage instant messaging service.

        Beeper Mini was downloaded more than 100,000 times within two days of launch. After the release, Apple repeatedly blocked Beeper Mini from sending messages through iMessage, and Beeper updated the app multiple times to circumvent Apple’s blocks.[18] On December 21, 2023, Beeper issued its last update to Beeper Mini, which requires users to access an iOS or macOS device to enable the app to send messages through iMessage.[20]

        That timeline is crazy. It’s a chat app for years. It breaks into iMessage and gets crazy downloads. Then 16 days later they’ve given up. Four months later he sells the whole thing.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, he seems to have a bad habit of bailing on his pet projects once they become “difficult” partially because he never seems to have an actual plan to get them to financial stability. It’s why I’m so hesitant to have any hopes for this reboot of Pebble after he bailed on it the first time around.

  • pigup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    How does this compare to pine64? I want a privacy focused watch if at all possible

    • blandfordforever@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m with you on this. If it could come with a privacy-respecting smartphone app hosted on F-Droid, that would be so great.

    • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have a PineTime running through Gadgetbridge, and a Pebble Time Steel with Rebble services. You can pair the Pebble with Gadgetbridge and run it that way, and I imagine these new Core watches would operate similarly… But we will find out as time goes on.