For context: I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD and I somehow need to get an app on there that only has a flatpak release

  • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is the best one for people that don’t know a lot about linux. Many people are at a loss when they read basic errors like fatal error: <header>.h: No such file or directory or ld: cannot find -l<library>. Flatpak solves a lot of that by specifically including all of it in the installation.

    So ye, for non-power users, flatpak is the best package manager. It also has only one downside, which is the increased storage requirement for apps as they have to bring all of their dependencies themselves, which is okay these days as storage isn’t that expensive anymore.

    And everything is better than fucking snap if we’re honest for a second.

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I really don’t understand the flatpak hate. Stuff doesn’t magically work across distros, and app devs don’t usually want to debug every major one. If you’re running linux on a thinkpad from 2004, sure, it wouldn’t be the best but most people can probably afford the overhead.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Linux people tend to have very strong opinions lol. I don’t get the hate either, but I do understand why people dislike the thought of having the same library lying around multiple times. I am one of those “purists”, but that’s why I compile most things from source