Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agoAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1966arrow-down137
arrow-up1929arrow-down1imageAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldPharmacokinetics@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square121fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down8·8 days agoThey’re just called lawyers, unless they’re lawyering with their genitals and their sex is somehow relevant.
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 days ago“single female lawyer fighting for justice and also being single,”
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoThat’s a deep reference. Very nice.
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoI’m a nostalgia sniper today
minus-squareDannyBoy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 days ago“70% of lawyers suffer discrimination in the workplace but only 30% of lawyers face discrimination.”
minus-squareWoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·8 days agoThere are obviously still contacts where the distinction is important.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·8 days agoMaybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”. Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoImmediate scenario that came to mind here is The client demanded any other public defender, as long as they weren’t black or female.
minus-squarelagoon8622@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 days agoSuch as discussing discrimination, statistics, etc
They’re just called lawyers, unless they’re lawyering with their genitals and their sex is somehow relevant.
“single female lawyer fighting for justice and also being single,”
That’s a deep reference. Very nice.
I’m a nostalgia sniper today
“70% of lawyers suffer discrimination in the workplace but only 30% of lawyers face discrimination.”
There are obviously still contacts where the distinction is important.
Maybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”.
Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
Immediate scenario that came to mind here is
Such as discussing discrimination, statistics, etc