From the article:

"I know for a fact that Wikipedia operates under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, which explicitly states that if you’re going to use the data, you must give attribution. As far as search engines go, they can get away with it because linking back to a Wikipedia article on the same page as the search results is considered attribution.

But in the case of Brave, not only are they disregarding the license - they’re also charging money for the data and then giving third parties “rights” to that data."

  • azron@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Librewolf is starting to replace Firefox for me. Either way birds of a feather!

    • Jarmer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think LW is better out of the box. It has both UBO and Containers built in. Which is just awesome. I still use FF as my daily just because I have customized it beyond belief, but if I were to start over again I think I’d start with LW.