(e: also it’s a static image; no need to indicate whether it’s interlaced or progressive, because again, it’s a static image. And before you get pendantic: yes I’m aware that PNGs can be interlaced or progressive—but this is a JPEG—and those terms mean something completely different when referring to static images, compared to video.)
damn it’s even in the original 140p
deleted by creator
120x160, actually, but effectively close enough.
(e: also it’s a static image; no need to indicate whether it’s interlaced or progressive, because again, it’s a static image. And before you get pendantic: yes I’m aware that PNGs can be interlaced or progressive—but this is a JPEG—and those terms mean something completely different when referring to static images, compared to video.)
It’s also not a progressive JPEG either.
lol