Banned is maybe too far, but why should we as a country allow people to have petty power over meaningless things their neighbors do? Could we ban HOAs from being included in house sales, and every time it’s sold the new owners have to opt in?

For the most part, I’m wondering about this in the context of single family homes since for homes like condos, you could make the case that HOAs are useful for shared things like roofs and whatnot. Maybe limit mandatory HOA involvement to things like what’s truly necessary and shared and not how tall your grass is?

  • Rei@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I think they have the potential to be good if they were way more democratic, but they’re never run that way.

    When I lived in a townhouse that was part of an HOA that had some nice things going for it. There were a couple tennis courts, a swimming pool, a communal garden, a club house thing you can pay to use, they regularly mowed the front yards and trimmed the front hedges and they would periodically repaint the fronts of the houses. However, while I was living there, the head of the HOA was a douche that kept misusing funds.

    The house my sister lives in has an HOA that does literally nothing except bitch residents to upkeep their lawn.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      it’s baffling that HOAs don’t have strict regulation on how they’re run, how it should work is like any other association: elections every X years, any member can run for positions, and operations have to be documented and transparent.