• 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

    If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you’re paying them a titbit more than what the service they’re providing is worth.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sure they’re less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome’s market share

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The sheer market share that forces websites develop for chrome for maximum visibility, to force websites to allow their content to be scraped to be usable by the average user.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they’re charging. From what I read, I think they’re still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It’s genius!

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Likely it’ll use the cloud for processing, you’ll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like “prompt by default” and “AI autocomplete”, which you can only “snooze” as they’ll automatically be turned back on the moment there’s a “great new feature”, like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it’s made by real artists.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here’s your evidence that there’s no such thing.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    When a company considers buying Chrome because it could help them extend the reach of their product, they are fucking drunk and need to go home. This would be like buying the state of Nevada so you could put up billboards all over Las Vegas.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, MS just wants to expand their monopoly, but “MS buying most common browser, after antitrust laws already forbid internet explorer” doesnt ring so well.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I suspect Altman has ambitions beyond being Microsoft’s cat’s paw, though it may be that that’s all he really is once the shouting is over.

      • TON618@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They don’t want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that’s assuming they’d be successful enough to make it happen.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    This can’t happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it’s got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

      Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

      Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Firefox, the software mainly driven by Mozilla, which is heavily investing in AI and ads ventures? That Firefox?

      But, maybe “it will be different this time”, I guess.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Considering how little they invest into their core product compared to all the other shit and how much money the top brass earns despite declining market share, I don’t think they’re hurting for money that much.

          • doodledup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are investing a lot in their core product. Problem is that you can’t really monatize it. You want Firefox to be paywalled?

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ideally it would be financed by user donations. Probably not that realistic for a project like this, though.

              • doodledup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                You can’t finance a massive project like that with donations. This isn’t like Signal or some small project like that. Firefox is MASSIVE.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, web browsers cost hundreds of millions per year to maintain, they’re mind-bogglingly complicated and costly.

                I’d really hope the Linux Foundation would help contribute towards the budget, but LF is quite pro Chromium.

                I don’t think end users can even come close to funding Firefox development, unfortunately.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That really doesn’t solve the problem, like every other Firefox fork they’re completely dependent on Firefox. You can’t just make a new webbrowser just like that, and while third party developers can certainly disable some anti-features, there are limits to that and they can definitely not do the basic work that the Firefox devs do (or could do, if Mozilla had different priorities).

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some of their I initiatives are good, like the built-in local translation tool we now have.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          Also their initiative to recognise images and generate alt-text for screen-reader users.

          My sister is blind and screen readers are close to useless on the web, so it was great to hear Mozilla is working on that.