From what I understand the current case isn’t about the 14th amendment directly, but rather whether or not the judge had the authority to suspend Trump’s order. It’s a jurisdiction question, not a constitutionality question.
So yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if they rule that it was outside the judge’s scope of power but that the 14th amendment question isn’t settled and has to be determined by a higher court.
From what I understand the current case isn’t about the 14th amendment directly, but rather whether or not the judge had the authority to suspend Trump’s order. It’s a jurisdiction question, not a constitutionality question.
So yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if they rule that it was outside the judge’s scope of power but that the 14th amendment question isn’t settled and has to be determined by a higher court.
I was going to respond but their justification is very stupid.