On May 12, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, demanded that cities throughout the state adopt anti-camping ordinances that would effectively ban public homelessness by requiring unhoused individuals to relocate every 72 hours.

While presented as a humanitarian effort to reduce homelessness, the new policy victimizes California’s growing unhoused population—approximately 187,000 people—by tying funding in Proposition 1 to local laws banning sleeping or camping on public land.

In his announcement, Newsom pushed local governments to adopt the draconian ordinances “without delay.”

  • SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    The most coherent argument I’ve heard from reddit-logo is that the whole point of this policy is to ping-pong the homeless around till they naturally congregate in areas far enough out of site that nobody will bother reporting them anymore. So basically forcing them into massive isolated encampments so you don’t have homeless people in public parks and shit.

    Honestly if that’s the fucking goal why not just be honest and have the state buy some vacant lots and make sanctioned “camping sites”. At least then NGOs and shit could set up like showers and clinics and stuff nearby them. But knowing Amerikkka they’d probably just become concentration camps.

    God forbid some just build some fucking public housing.

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly if that’s the fucking goal why not just be honest and have the state buy some vacant lots and make sanctioned “camping sites”.

      frothingfash “I’M NOT HAVING MY TAX DOLLARS PAY FOR SOME slur TO LIVE COMFORTABLY WITHOUT WORKING”

        • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Even that is too much, no politician in this wasteland is going to vote for a measure to establish land solely for the homeless.

          None of those people would want to be known as the person who voted to establish what would doubtlessly become smeared as a ‘homeless encampment’ in their district/state.

          • SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            I feel like you could retort to that “well it’s better than them camping in your local park!” But Democrats aren’t smart or brave enough for that.

            Regardless, I wouldn’t trust the US to implement something like this in any sort or humane or effective way.