Huawei and TP-Link also make much better products than most American brands
deleted by creator
“Real-vulns” christ on a cracker the human species is fucking broken you don’t have to make cringe new slang for everything
Counterpoint: Fuck the english language.
“Real-vulns”
just rolns of the tounge that one. rural juror tier
I’m loving the Xiaomi Mesh wifi I bought as a gift to my parents. Zero issues. Idk about how secure they are but I trust them more than ISP stuff (even if those used to be Huawei anyway)
I might crash out if TP-Link is banned ngl.
Stanning huawei: sure, I don’t know much about that equipment, it could be generally good.
Stanning tp-link:
The last time I used a TP-link switch I needed to keep replacing it every 3 weeks because it keept breaking. Those things cannot take a beating.
I had a TP-Link wifi router that was fucking amazing for my gigabit fiber connection… never had a single problem in several years of running it and it cost all of $40
Your’s was probably not sustaining repeated 6G impacts
Joke about a new wifi standard called 6G
“can’t be manipulated” is a stretch. The chairman/CEO and CFO both have party membership and the company is primarily held by a union, although it is unclear if the union holds the majority of class-b shares. There is party influence in Huawei through the executive and possibly the ownership despite them technically being private. The party has limited control over Huawei, but control nonetheless.
manipulated by america I think is the thing
that is what I meant
Pretty obviously imo lol
The party has limited control over Huawei, but control nonetheless.
I’d imagine that with such a large strategically important company they have more than limited control of it, which is cool and good and how it should be.
Party control is there but isn’t always strong enough, even with party members, such as in the case of the Alibaba Group and Jack Ma.
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Objectively incorrect.
A number of Chinese laws state that Chinese individuals and organisations must, if asked, co-operate with intelligence work.
Nice of the Chinese government to ask, the US government certainly wouldn’t
Objectively incorrect.
I do it voluntarily.
Look up edward snowden
Notably, China is the only country in the world where you’re legally required to comply with government requests
Note: this is true of companies based in the US
objectively the dumbest comment in this thread
Name a country wherein this is not true. Also the intention of the post title is clear: Free from US influence.
There’s two types of responses in this thread. People who assume ‘manipulated’ means ‘pushed around by a foreign (the US) government’. And people who assume ‘manipulated’ means ‘complying with locals laws (that of China)’. I don’t know wether the latter is a knee jerk response in favor of corporate sovereignty, or if it is about US extraterritoriality. After all, whenever we order Twitter to comply with Brazilian laws, the US government cites its own constitution or whatever to censor us.
It depends on your threat model, but it seems most people in the lemmyverse live in some nato-aligned (or at least not aligned with the PRC) country, so if you are concerned about surveillance from your domestic state it would be safer to use Chinese technology. Sure, the PRC government might also be spying on you but what are they gonna do with that data? You don’t live there lol. Unless you’re working for the FBI or something, but in that case I hope the PRC spies on you a lot.
