Trump tweet:

It is my Great Honor to report that the United States of America now fully owns and controls 10% of INTEL, a Great American Company that has an even more incredible future. I negotiated this Deal with Lip-Bu Tan, the Highly Respected Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The United States paid nothing for these Shares, and the Shares are now valued at approximately $11 Billion Dollars. This is a great Deal for America and, also, a great Deal for INTEL. Building leading edge Semiconductors and Chips, which is what INTEL does, is fundamental to the future of our Nation. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Thank you for your attention to this matter.

  • Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    I expect all the ML people to be celebrating this move towards socialism. Such a shit move but a shit admin.

  • randompasta@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    222
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    He just nationalized Intel. That’s what conservatives are afraid of far left governments doing.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yup. They also rewrote national broadband funding criteria so starlink would win most of the state contracts for funding. If the states are stupid enough to take it, the Elon Musk will own their citizens internet. Colorado just announced Starlink won half of all the contracts and Amazon the other half(I didn’t even know Amazon provided Internet holy terrifying):

      You may experience difficulty connecting to some web domains and your homepage has been preselected for you. Your monthly history will be reviewed and unpatriotic web usage will result in detainment or deportation.

      Congratulations on your Freedom!

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        B-b-but Starlink doesn’t build infrastructure for normal broadband, does it? So they basically got a load of free money for doing nothing on a state level, just their satellites flying someplace above? I mean, there are Starlink ground stations, so there is infrastructure, just how many people would use it instead of a normal service. You know, GPON to the door, no antenna suffering in bad weather, no exorbitant prices.

    • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      169
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Further, he killed all trust in Intel. Now, no one will believe that there are no government back doors into everything they make.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        26 days ago

        There’s literally Intel Management Engine or how is it called.

        And they are literally an American corporation that has always benefited from American governments pressuring competitors from other countries, and that was important for MIC since 70s.

        So that kind of trust was a clear no since long before I was born.

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Their biggest problem is that people don’t want to buy their stuff because it’s bad, they can worry about their backdoory image later

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          26 days ago

          Honestly this. Their cpus melting down over the past couple years and their refusal to even acknowledge it hurt their image more than any potential backdoor could.

      • frazw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        26 days ago

        Intel never deserved trust. They rigged the game by cheating on benchmark tests and deserve the karma they are currently enjoying.

        I guess the average consumer would not be very aware of Intel being so shitty, but now everyone has a reason to be wary of them.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Yeah… no one who this matters to thought that anyway. Either you get Chinese or US backdoors in your hardware. This has always been true. Theoretically Intel could make some backdoorless chips for government use though, but we won’t have access to that.

        • Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          25 days ago

          So true, I’ve officially bought my last Intel product, though I didn’t know it at the time… A shame cause I was interested in their GPUs at maybe some point in the future. From now on it’s either ARM or AMD. Can’t support a company (partially) controlled by a fascism regime.

    • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Those worthless cunt traitors never acted in good faith. FFS, they willingly elected a child rapist.

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      “Nationalized” with a heavy dose of quote marks. The government now owns about 10% of Intel in non-voting shares. It’s basically meaningless.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          China’s internal market is far more cutthroat and “capitalist” than that of the USA. And less regulated. And less monopolized, except for a few services which, ahem, are mandated (WeeChat, yes).

          That was their “unique path”, to move all hierarchical stuff into political entities. It look interesting on a large scale, from more “peasant-oriented” communism, kinda changing the initial Marxist picture of worker-capital relations, to this.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      10% is not “nationalized”. It’s “19.99% nationalized”. Need to have a majority stake (like 50.01%) to call it “nationalized”.

      Or maybe I’m wrong.

  • byte_0verflow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Right when I was thinking of buying an intel cpu and gpu to support the company and do my little part in helping increase competition in the cpu and gpu sector. Guess I will stick with amd this time around.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    26 days ago

    The United States will not seek direct representation on Intel’s board

    If they want change, they don’t to vote on the board. They can just pass laws in Intel’s favour.

    Taxpayers are now all Intel shareholders. I can’t understand what benefit this provides them.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      26 days ago

      As far as government bail outs go, I think taking a portion of the company in exchange is an excellent idea. THIS orange asshole is doing it for all the wrong reasons, and will VERY likely fuck up literally everything about it, but the idea is sound.

      I wonder what things would look like today if the government had taken some portion of control over all the auto manufacturers, airlines, banks, etc it has bailed out over the years instead of just giving them unsecured loans

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        you raise interesting questions. how do you stop some asshole president from using infinite taxpayer money to manipulate the price of a stock?

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I wonder what things would look like today if the government had taken some portion of control over all the auto manufacturers, airlines, banks, etc it has bailed out over the years instead of just giving them unsecured loans

        Would look like normal capitalism of the early XIX century, give or take. Bad, but not atrocious. Bailouts definitely wouldn’t be abused as much, because, eh, they wouldn’t be free.

        And the old argument that public sector management is inefficient - well, it’s not always a bad thing. It would then make sense for the government to re-privatize some of those shares, and use others for a source of income and a lever. And the companies bailed out this way would sink in power (which is good for competition), but not completely (which is good for their employees and economical stability). And, of course, I’ll repeat about source of income. Perhaps there will be no more raising taxes with such a system in place. Perhaps even some taxes it’ll be possible to simplify - any complex tax system works in favor of those who can afford to apply expertise, so those richer, and not poorer.

        Also partial or full nationalization may sometimes work to good outcomes, while nationalized companies are less efficient, they also tend to retain institutional knowledge better, have more people working long on the same positions, follow labor regulations. For the telephone company or the train company or the central heating company or the public bus company it makes sense to be nationalized.

  • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Why does he always close with “Thank you for your attention to this matter”? Does he think he’s got his big boy pants on or something?

    • absentbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yes, but also because they’re just better chips and you probably should have only been getting them to begin with. Way more power efficient, smaller process, less heat, easier to upgrade, better multi core performance, lower price; you just get a better CPU.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        25 days ago

        Note that better multicore perf is not true through the entire stack, because Intel chips have p core making them have better multicore perf in a lot of price-competitive offerings.

        But the current platform is quite dead, you won’t get upgrades for it

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    26 days ago

    Could you imagine how many times the word “socialism” would be blasted on Fox News if Biden did this?

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          25 days ago

          I’m worse, I’m not ever voting at all in US elections. Being a Russian citizen and never having set foot in the US.

          But they are one big criminal family. I mean, yes, in the 90s Clinton and the democratic party really had sort of a plan of battle, but they dropped the ball completely. It’s unfortunate, because had they not, maybe our world would really be similar to more utopian lines from sci-fi.