• Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Of course! It’s always refreshing to engage with someone with good intentions.

    So, this would only be a misrepresentation if the authors were claiming to look for causes of Autism.

    Good science is based on testing a hypothesis. ‘What causes X’ is not a testable hypothesis, it’s too broad, the variables aren’t defined. ‘Does Y effect X?’ is a testable hypothesis, and a solid basis for initial research.

    The question of ‘what causes autism’ is a huge one that can’t be answered by a single study. Each potential factor needs to be evaluated on its own merit, and this study does exactly that (with admittedly questionable results).

    However, something like the recent HHS report is exactly the place where it’s wildly irresponsible to present only one potential hypothesis as a ‘cause’. That’s where we would expect a high level view of a range of established factors (since obviously there is no one ‘cause’).