• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look, I think it’d be better without the cheating bit. I’ll give you that it’s definitely a weird inclusion. Pretty sure I already said as much to someone else, if not directly to you. The rest of it, though? There’s a lot of nit picking and stretching to make it at all misogynistic or incel related.

    As for imagery, I think we’re interpreting different things from the symbols. The broken heart and the frown represents not being in a relationship, despite being in love. The sunglasses aren’t supposed to represent coolness, but sneaking around, being ‘shady’. Overall could it be more clear? Sure. Could it just remove cheating and be a lot more agreeable? Sure. But with just a bit of contemplation it’s really not saying anything unreasonable.

    • LizardKing@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry but you simply don’t seem to understand how imagery and symbolism works.

      The artists intent is very clear. You are trying so hard to defend this random dumb comic strip on the internet instead of just admitting it’s a dumb comic strip on the internet.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not trying that hard lmao. It’s just not as cut and dry as you seem to think it is. The symbolism used has a few interpretations.

        I’m also not trying that hard, because I’ve already admitted multiple times that I think it’d be a better comic without the cheating bit.

        The only thing I’m defending, or I suppose attacking, is the notion that it’s somehow misogynistic and incel-y.