• BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is definitely such a thing as jobs that take lots of book learning and tests to get, and jobs anyone can get by applying for them. This semantic fight of “No such thing as unskilled labor” is just going to make people call it something new and politically correct, but it won’t change reality.

    • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not semantics, it’s just refusing to use an inaccurate name. Just because anyone can get a job doesn’t mean anyone can excel at it. Why are you suggesting we should all consent to the lie that unskilled labor exists?

    • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which are the people who are dominating culture and language, who carry the power to fulfill your prediction?

      How do such distinctions and constructs originally emerge, and why do they remain entrenched?

        • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Straw man attack.

          Ad-hominem appeal to motive.

          I have not advocated for a definition being imposed.

          I have encouraged critical inquiry over the emergence and entrenchment of terms and constructs.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is why everyone is an engineer these days. Guy with a mop? Sanitation engineer. Guy who sells stuff all day? Sales engineer. Help desk? No, systems engineer.

      Title inflation isnt a big deal but it is silly.