Whats the point of writing prn, f@ck, sht or anything like that instead of the actual words? You can still read them, its not like they are gone if you replace a letter or two.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because swearing is a natural part of the human experience and most level headed people don’t feel the need to suppress human expression.

        Swearing serves an important biological need to express emotion and communicate. Psychologically, we swear to express strong emotions and when people swear, they are inherently viewed as more trustworthy or honest. Swearing helps people bond.

        • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not talking about swearing. Call someone a fucking shit-eating worm is fine. But on the other hand are words used to insult marginalized groups (women, homosexuals, the mentally disabled, etc.). B/*itch, wh/*ore, c/*nt; c/*cksucker, f/*g; r/*tard, a/*tist, etc.

          These are the words being blocked. Not swears, slurs. You can say fuck, shit, damn, and hell all you want.

          For what it’s worth, I tend to fall on the side of a little bit being fine. I don’t use those words (except the slurs against w/*men), but if there’s one thing I fucking hate, it’s Scolds. If Felix Biederman wants to call people r/*tards and c/*cksuckers, I think he should be allowed to, and I’m not going to try to cancel him for it.

      • Susaga@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Bitch” is not a slur. It is a swear. Swears are fine, slurs are not. They are not equivelant, and shouldn’t be treated as such.

        • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hate ml mods as much as the next guy, but also I would consider “bitch” to be kinda misogynistic in certain context.

          • Susaga@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The same can be said of any gendered term. That’s honestly a comment on the context more than the word.

            If you say the word bitch is as offensive as the f slur, t slur or n word, then you’re saying those slurs are as harmless as the word bitch. If you believe that, I am offended by you. Do not put them in the same group.

          • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            see the problem I have here is by banning a word that is used as a slur maybe once every 1000 times you remove the 999 times it was not used as a slur, thereby making the situation worse rather than better. Banning words does fuck all to promote a healthier culture, all it does is make the vultures migrate to the next word they load up with negative connotations

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Holy fucking hell. What kind of pearl clutching Victorian era bullshit is that?