Sorry I can’t archive, archive.today likes to just decide not to work sometimes.
Anyway, I HIGHLY doubt these will be more beneficial than a standard off the shelf drone.
Sorry I can’t archive, archive.today likes to just decide not to work sometimes.
Anyway, I HIGHLY doubt these will be more beneficial than a standard off the shelf drone.
Well, it’s not a war crime to use chemical weapons on a robot. I can see these being neutralized pretty much immediately.
You know how agent orange was supposedly for deforestation? Imagine what could be done on the pretext of trying to disable robots and then the soldiers are collateral.
Deployment of chemical weapons is not really that precise as to avoid humans… or even I would think effective against a robot?. An EMP would however be easy to use against these without any collateral.
As another person said, it would probably be used as an excuse to gas soldiers, but a quick google leads me to believe that fast corrosing agents could be made that are generally non-toxic, just highly irritating. An EMP would probably be a nuclear bomb, so that would have collateral too.