(credit to RomCom1989 for the title)

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of an Iranian soldier exulting in the launch of a ballistic missile aimed towards the imperialists.


short summary this week: US doing pretty bad and Iran doing pretty good all things considered, Strait of Hormuz is closed and will almost certainly remain so until the end of the war, Trump has no idea what to do, global economic crisis from strait closure is basically guaranteed at this point but who will ultimately benefit most and who will ultimately lose most is still up in the air.

longish summary is below in the spoiler tags

longish summary

While there are still major debates raging about how badly things are actually going right now and what the post-conflict map may look like, as we blaze past the two week mark on this conflict, it’s becoming ever more obvious to almost everybody involved that this war is not going according to plan, if there ever was one. US airstrikes are, from what I can best determine, still mostly done with relatively less powerful (but still very dangerous!) and much less plentiful standoff munitions launched from bombers, though certain border and coastal areas are being struck with more powerful and more plentiful short-range guided bombs. This indicates that Iranian air defense is still sufficiently functional throughout most of Iran that the kinds of true carpet bombing done against Korea and Vietnam in the past (and Gaza very recently) is still too risky, though their airspace is still very much under assault, as we appear to have images of small groups of Western fighters breaching relatively deep into the country. Under some kind of Iranian pressure (drones? missiles? speedboats?) one aircraft carrier has retreated to a thousand kilometers from Iran, hiding behind the mountains of Oman; the other is sitting in the Red Sea, rather pointedly out of range of Yemen. As such, the ranges that Western aircraft must travel to bombard Iran is increasing, which reduces their frequency and increases strain on maintenance and logistics in the medium and long term.

While there is tons to say about the current social, economic, and military state of Iran, I don’t think I have a reliable enough picture to give a good summary beyond “they aren’t close to defeat or regime change”. What has instead captured much of the world’s attention is the continuing blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has inspired some of the most delusional statements I have seen so far in my life, which is sincerely a profound achievement. For those out of the loop: the strait is currently closed to all shipping except those going to very particular countries (I’ve seen China and Bangladesh mentioned, and apparently India is in the process of working something out and may succeed or fail). This is because most ships are not risking the trip due to the ~20 tankers and container ships that Iran has already struck and disabled in the strait and in the Persian Gulf. Additionally, the threat from Iran’s military to Navy ships is such that attempting to create a convoy to guide tankers through it is suicidal to both the Navy and merchant ships. Right now it cannot be done, and it very well might be the case that it could never be done, simply due to the combination of Iran’s naval forces (hundreds, perhaps thousands, of armed, specialized speedboats designed for exactly this purpose), their drones (in the tens of thousands), their torpedoes, and if all else fails, their naval mines.

The Western reaction to this has been so moronic that it has almost integer underflowed into being philosophical: what does it truly mean for a passage to be “closed”? Has Iran truly “closed” the strait, or is the risk of traversing it simply too high for these cowardly sailors (who, for some strange reason, seem to care about their “lives” and “families”)? How is it possible for Iran to have closed the strait if, according to the West, Iran’s military has been totally obliterated? All these questions and more plague the minds of those who cannot accept the now-proven fact that there are indeed military forces on this planet that the US Navy with all its aircraft carriers and destroyers and submarines cannot defeat; and one of those minds is, rather hilariously, Trump himself. His thrice-daily positive affirmations that Iran has been defeated are taking on an increasingly deranged and almost pitiable tone; the lamentations of a man who has finally found a situation where him merely stating that something is true is insufficient to change the situation one iota. Despite stating that some kind of naval compact or alliance is being established to protect shipping, every Western country so far - from the UK, to France, to Japan, to Australia - has publicly stated that they will not risk their ships to do so. All this as the continued blockade yet further guarantees a worldwide energy, production, transportation, and food crisis that will have major global ramifications for at least the rest of the decade and almost certainly beyond.

If the anti-imperialists play their cards right, the US could lose much from this crisis, and others, like China and Russia, could gain a great deal. To quote Nia Frome (co-founder of Red Sails): “An effective Marxist has to be enough of an accelerationist/pervert to treat the obviously bad things that are going to happen as the political opportunities they are.”


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • aqwxcvbnji [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A journalist from Press TV posted the following:

    Sayyed Khamenei outlined three concrete demands, each with a defined timeline: a rapid U.S. military withdrawal from the Middle East, a full rollback of sanctions within 60 days, and long-term financial compensation for economic damages.

    Then came the ultimatum. Fail to comply, and Iran escalates, economically, militarily, and potentially nuclearly. Not hypothetically, but operationally: closing the Strait of Hormuz, formalizing defense ties with Russia and China, and moving from ambiguity to declared nuclear deterrence.

    What’s notably absent here, is de-dollarisation of the oil trade, which is what would be necessary to end the US status as Global hegemon. Are we deluding ourselves here that this is one of the Iranian objectives, because it’s what we 'd like to see ourselves?

    Edit: language-error, non-native speaker

    • gwysibo [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are we [deluding] ourselves here that this is one of the Iranian objectives

      My understanding is that payment in yuan is the main condition for sailing oil tankers through the strait, that this is a real thing happening now which some countries have already agreed to. It’s strange we don’t see it here but that’s probably because they want to slow roll it, no way the US just laterally gives up the petrodollar in one go

      • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 month ago

        no way the US just laterally gives up the petrodollar in one go

        Yeah, Iran telling the US that one of their victory conditions is basically just “demolish your entire empire” would see the nukes flying.

    • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, I think so. De-dollarization first requires something to replace the USD’s position. This could be either a.) a basket of currencies à la bancor, or b.) another sovereign currency to replace it.

      The first option requires the world to coordinate a bancor-like system. Which, sure, that could happen. But there’s no plans for that right now. The other option is to have another currency, presumably the yuan, replace the USD. But that absolutely will not work unless China themselves take action to replace the USD with yuan, which would mean moving away from an export-driven economy. At this point in time I would say China is not interested in this (to say the least).

      Iran can weaken the USD’s position by trading in yuan, but this in itself won’t really bring us much closer to de-dollarization, it’s reasonable that Iran isn’t pushing this as a strategy.

      • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        A reserve currency system doesn’t have to last forever, accounts could be settled in whatever the two countries agree on. There could be chunks/regions/alliances where accounts are settled in USD, and some in Euro, some in gold (lol). The Euro is already quite a significant fraction right now of world trade. The USD would go limping on as an important currency among many, and now no longer needed to buy or sell oil.

        The time between when people knew the pound was going out to it actually being out was like 1920s to 1944. Suppose Iran does accomplish this, that doesn’t mean de-dollarization here and now. It would probably be the nail in the coffin and would be the obvious point when the beginning of the end started for the dollar as the reserve current.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 month ago

          De-dollarization didn’t start in February, is the thing. It’s been an ongoing shift in the global economy since the formation and further development of the BRICS, and then accelerated with the sanctions against Russia, and then accelerated further when the pandemic disrupted global trade, and now it’s accelerating even further with Iran directly attacking the petrodollar.

          So, it started in 2009. We’re actually halfway through your timeline.

      • KnilAdlez [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        But that absolutely will not work unless China themselves take action to replace the USD with yuan, which would mean moving away from an export-driven economy.

        I have seen this take before, could you explain a little more about why China would have to stop being an export-driven economy? So long China takes on debt to circulate it’s currency, it should work the same, no?


    • I don’t think Iran can feasibly demand ending the petrodollar in negotiations. That would, as you rightly put it, collapse the American empire and their bourgeoisie knows that as much as we do.

      They’re abandoning that goal, imo. Iran will make a deal with the US on the things that the US could theoretically accept, namely the sanctions relief, reparations (which may be spun as “investment in the defeated Iranian regime” by Trump), and abandoning bases that the US doesnt really have the means to occupy anyway (plus, Trump will spin that as “bringing our boys home”).

      Meanwhile, Iran will continue placing tariffs on the Hormuz as well as pushing the region towards adopting the Yuan, which in itself is pushing China towards a way more confrontational path with the imperial core than before. It’s the sort of hybrid warfare we talk about from the yanks.