Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1602arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square71fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoSometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0