Hello fellow Lemmings!

Title. Is it possible for Lemmy to abide by the GDPR given that you can’t delete info from other instances?

  • Pfosten@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the other hand, the GDPR’s concept of “personal data” is extremely broad, much more so than the US concept of PII. Personal data is any information relating to an identifiable person. Pseudonymous info is still personal under this definition. Online usernames or social media handles are identifiers, and any linked info (e.g. posts, comments, likes) is personal data as well.

    So Lemmy and other Fediverse stuff is well within the GDPR’s material scope.

    However, the GDPR’s “right to erasure /to be forgotten” is more nuanced. It doesn’t quite always apply (though usually does). OP very likely has the right to request deletion from individual instances.

    Posts have been published through federation. The GDPR anticipates this (I think in Art 17(2)): if personal data has been made public by the data controller, and erasure is requested, then the data controller is obliged to take reasonable steps to notify other controllers of this.

    The ActivityPub protocol has built-in support for sending out such deletion notifications, and last time I checked Lemmy implements this. Of course the receiving instance might not honor this, but that’s outside of the responsibility of the initial data controller.

    While I’m not entirely convinced that everything here is 100% compliant, federation is less of a compliance issue than it might seem.

    • ritswd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, and in my case to be clear, it was all businesses headquartered in the US, doing business in Europe, and getting compliant with Europe’s GDPR. I have no idea if it was any different if the businesses were headquartered in Europe (guessing no), but I thought I’d confirm that was the situation.