cross-posted from: https://monyet.cc/post/153506

The U.K. Parliament is close to passing the Online Safety Bill, which threatens global privacy by allowing backdoors into messaging services, compromising end-to-end encryption. Despite objections, no amendments were accepted. The bill also includes content filtering and surveillance measures. There’s still a chance for lawmakers to protect privacy with an amendment preserving encryption. A recent survey shows the majority of U.K. citizens want strong privacy on messaging apps.

  • phi1997@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m surprised banks haven’t stepped in. They wouldn’t help for the good of the world, but this would destroy online commerce and banking.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why would banks step in? All your financial data is already accessible to the government.

      I doubt any of these efforts will break TLS, in-transit, or any at rest type of encryption. They’re goal is to break E2E “zero access” encryption, and it’s usage by commoners. The data and services they can’t already gain access to… Even if they did, politicians will absolve their capital handlers the same as they always absolve themselves, because they’re criminally corrupt corporate whores.

      • bighi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not because they care about the government. Because they care about hackers.

        Creating encryption backdoors for the government means creating encryption backdoors for hackers. Because once encryption is weakened, it’s weakened.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Again, they aren’t going to break the encryption that corporations use, because the laws they pass are ghost written by corporations. Multinationals aren’t going to abandon their own security and dramatically increase their risk because some UK oligarchs go off the deep end.

          They will only break the encryption that the proles use, because this is only about increasing control, power, data mining, and profits.

      • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        London was Europe’s banking center. Post Brexit much of it has moved to other EU countries, but there are still large teams in London handling investments all over Europe.

  • insta11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point they should just try to ban Math because that’s what they’re essentially trying to accomplish fucking morons man

    • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The state of Indiana once almost passed a bill that would’ve legally defined the mathematical constant of pi to be 3.2.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know if post-Brexit Britain has the juice for this. If nothing else, Signal is going to exit. Losing the entire EU is a major hit to a company but losing the UK? I could see companies just offering a degraded experience for UK users. (Green bubble style, basically.)

    • Satelllliiiiiiiteeee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funny you mention green bubbles, Apple has said they would pull iMessage and FaceTime from the UK rather than add a backdoor. Signal and WhatsApp have also said they would leave the market rather than comply and Google has opposed the bill but I haven’t personally seen any reporting on if they said they’d pull services from the UK.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The UK doesn’t have sufficient international clout to do much of anything on a “worldwide” basis.

  • catreadingabook@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Galaxy brain idea: Just encrypt your messages manually. Agree on an algorithm and trade keys in-person, then send each other encrypted files that you decrypt with a separate program (and for added privacy, on a separate device that doesn’t have network access). It’s not convenient at all but the idea is hilarious.

    There’s an urban myth at my university that two students did this to test rumors that the school emails were being monitored, and after a few weeks later IT emailed them asking them to stop.

    • 𝖕𝖘𝖊𝖚𝖉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      As in, run GPG like you already do on important emails? mind == blown

      You can go a step further and do Diffie-Hellman on a pocket calculator for key agreement. Authentication is left as an exercise for the reader tho.

  • Haus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The UK has always been on the leading edge of encryption, because they’ve got to work out what Northerners are on about.