• SteveTech@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t know if I’ll remember, but I’ll be able to try this in a few days, I have the same laptop, 2x 2.5G USB NICs + another 2 already in the mail, and also a 10G network.

    If you’re wondering, my intention for ordering them definitely wasn’t for this, but more just for places around the house I can plug into, without having the framework NIC hanging off my laptop.

      • SteveTech@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Alright, so testing with iperf3 to a 10G host:

        • Single Direction - 7.06 Gbps RX (2.35, 2.35, 1.25, 1.11 Gbps individually), 9.4 Gbps TX (All 2.35 Gbps)
        • Bidirectionally - 8 Gbps Total, 1.538 Gbps RX & 6.55 Gbps TX (315/1220, 232/2080, 256/1520, 735/1730 Mbps individually)

        4x USB NICs on the laptop, 1x Solarflare SFN5122F NIC on the desktop, there were 2 10G switches in between which may have affected the speeds slightly.

        Also I can get 4.6 Gbps total (2.3/2.3) bidirectionally on one interface, so I would have expected ~16 Gbps with 4, so that’s interesting I guess? My desktop can do 18.6 Gbps total (9.55/9.11) to my server so idk.

        Edit: I was using 1500 MTU, I don’t feel like testing again with jumbo frames.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Fascinating, especially that the RX direction saw such varied speeds across the various NICs. Guess that switch wasn’t too keen on trying to split the packets evenly. Also – 1.5Gbit RX in bidirectional mode? …all I can say is yikes.

          Very good to know.

          @[email protected] – you were interested in this too

          • SteveTech@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Guess that switch wasn’t too keen on trying to split the packets evenly.

            Yeah probably, I was just using one of those cheap 2x 10G + 4x 2.5G switches that ServeTheHome recently did a video on, so I would not be surprised if that was the bottle neck here.

            I could maybe try buying a few more SFP+ transceivers and using my more trustworthy switches, but that seems too expensive for a project like this.