• NiyaShy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If companies that still used plastic spools are starting to switch to cardboard, I think that’s a good thing. Not only is it easier to recycle, but probably also lighter (your typical 1kg filament spool weighs around 200-300g), so the bulk should save some fuel for transportation.

    Though I personally prefer using no spool at all (during shipping) 😉 Wherever possible I buy Masterspool refills.

    • Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the spool is frequently included in the weight of the roll, so you’re getting 1kg either way. you get more plastic for printing, though.

      • NiyaShy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uh, that would be deceiving marketing, a 1kg spool should contain 1kg of filament…
        But hey, maybe my view on this is a bit warped because I only buy filament from reputable brands (and usually from their own store) and not from marketplaces like “big A” where hundreds of sellers battle to be the cheapest.

        • Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a “reputable” thing … it’s a process thing. Scales don’t get zeroed every time a fresh spool is loaded. Doing so adds complexity.

          It’s pretty common for consumer goods to include the mass of packaging when the product is sold by mass across most industries.

  • scotticus42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I started ordering polymaker coming from overture. Both brands had swapped to cardboard spools. But as mentioned polymaker has a file uploaded to printables to print a ring border so they can roll easier. Especially since the cardboard rolls can get dented if shipped haphazardly.

    https://www.printables.com/model/495778-polymaker-cardboard-spool-adapter

    But I’ve gotten lucky, and the spools I have received with cardboard haven’t been damaged. But I have considered printing a few of these just in case…

  • PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many manufacturers have been moving to cardboard. Less wasteful than plastic spools, more convenient than reusable spools.

  • 0235@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have had cardboard spools for a while. I am on the fence. They are much easier to recycle (no matter how many 1million and 1 uses for plastic spools exist). however they creak horribly on my spool holder, and are much larger than most of the similar weight poly spools i have, so i had to create bespoke spool holders for all 3 printers i have!

    • valeen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t seem to work very well with the AMS system from Bambu. Good news is can occasionally transplant them to a reusable (and printable too) spool.

      • 0235@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I sometimes do, transfer a bit of filament to a mini roll. There are a few decent files out there for re-spooling out there.

        As environmental shakey 3d printing is, I am happy to be inconvenienced by cardboard spools, as that is one disposable things we can make not-plastic.

        • valeen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One interesting use for the ams system is automatic filament switching for when you want to finish a spool that has ??? Kg of filament left and you need a print to finish over night. Throw the questionable one in slot one and the new one in slot two, tell they system they are they same and it will switch over on run out.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer the cardboard spools. Recyclable, yet still reusable at least for a few times. I hate the idea of accumulating a bunch of non-recyclable plastic spools I don’t need and can’t get rid of in an environmentally friendly way. Latest Inland spool I got is cardboard, though I’ve had both cardboard and plastic spools from them in the past.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m noticing more brands embracing cardboard spools and I’m for it

    They’re easier to recycle

    My only issue is when they’re full they squeak on my filament holder during printing, but I’m planning to fix that… Eventually.

  • CobraA1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a trend, away from the plastic spools which were decidedly made from a non-recyclable plastic.

    It’s always been curious to me that recyclable plastic was never even considered to be an option.

    That said - cardboard is recyclable and biodegradable, so it’s good no matter how you dispose of it.

    But - it does have environmental downsides. If not carefully sourced, the wood can come from places where deforestation is a problem. It’s also rather energy intensive to make, so depending on the energy source can contribute to CO2 emissions.

    Nothing will be perfect, but cardboard is likely better than the alternatives.