• TALD@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why aim for shutting down nuclear power plants? The carbon emissions per kwh is the lowest out of all methods we have. Even with solar/wind there’s a carbon cost from the materials and maintenence and from what I remember that cost per kwh is higher than nuclear over a long enough time period.

    • Gsus4@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fine. Apart from the drama of designing, managing the plant, disposal, storage and guarding of residue, waste of mining and preparing the fuel and being a constant target for assholes (e.g. ZNPP), I have no major problem with nuclear power.

      Comparing with most sources today, it’s one of the cleanest and most reliable, but it’s not much cheaper than wind/solar if you account for the construction/maintenance/safety/insurance/dismantlement costs (last time I checked it was 0.06-0.15 per kWh).

      Still, I placed it really far down in the list, because it’s perfect for baseload power and should be the last of our concerns and the last option we ditch when addressing climate change (looking at you, Merkel).

      PS: on second thought, everybody also vastly underestimates the massive cost of disposing and recycling wind turbines and solar panels…yea :/