stoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Twitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checkswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1724arrow-down145
arrow-up1679arrow-down1external-linkTwitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checkswww.theverge.comstoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square141fedilink
minus-squarecountsickness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up79·1 年前So I guess now you can get your tweets pushed without disclosing that you payed for it…?
minus-squarecountsickness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 年前I am asking myself the same thing. But unless it’s actually advertising I guess the answer is yes. Might get interesting with twitter gold or whatever color the brand checkmate is.
minus-squareWarmSoda@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前Why were you asking yourself that. How would it possibly be illegal?
minus-squarejonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Twitter can do whatever the hell they want on their own website. They have no obligation to be fair in whatever they decide to boost or hide (with the exception of outright illegal content, obviously).
minus-squareWarmSoda@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前How would that be illegal? What law in which country would have anything to do with how a privately owned company handles that?
minus-squareanyone_yun@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前That must be the true reason behind this move
So I guess now you can get your tweets pushed without disclosing that you payed for it…?
That’s a bingo
“We just say bingo”
Ah that makes more sense.
Is this actually legal?
I am asking myself the same thing. But unless it’s actually advertising I guess the answer is yes.
Might get interesting with twitter gold or whatever color the brand checkmate is.
Why were you asking yourself that. How would it possibly be illegal?
Twitter can do whatever the hell they want on their own website. They have no obligation to be fair in whatever they decide to boost or hide (with the exception of outright illegal content, obviously).
How would that be illegal? What law in which country would have anything to do with how a privately owned company handles that?
That must be the true reason behind this move
They’re Xes, not tweets.