• Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah, it really removes the centaur advantage. I’m actually sort of surprised SpaceX hasn’t done this in -house prior.

    It’s also a new methalox engine.

    • marsokod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The main difficulty for this kind of tug is finding the market. There is currently only a very limited market for such missions:

      1. If the customer is big enough, then the rocket itself can do the injection. Otherwise, you can try to find another customer on the same orbit
      2. If it is a geo satellite, then it will have electric propulsion and adding a separate stage is hard to justify just by shortened transfer time
      3. If you are planning on reusing the same tug for multiple missions, you are fighting the rocket equation. This thruster here makes it really hard, you need more efficiency.

      The market fit is quite difficult, and this requires high investment. So very hard problem until we have an actual space economy with people on the moon.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think there’ll be a market for higher energy insertions: lunar missions, or beyond. Basically any part of the market served by the centaur upper stage. I also think it’ll combo well with Starship, maybe with a stretched tank.