• SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes that’s the point. We’re wealthier and more productive now and can consume some of that extra wealth. I am pointing out that we’re not comparing like for like.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Right now, most people are poorer than their counterparts from fifty years ago.

      Take away technological advances like computers and cell phones that that would have occurred anyway and look at things like work hours and quality of life.

      Hunter Thompson’s “Hell’s Angels” has a great chapter on the economics of being a biker/hippie/artist circa 1970. An Angel could work six months as a union stevedore and have enough money to hit the road for two years. A part time waitress could support herself and her musician boyfriend.

      As late as 1980, ‘middle class’ was defined as one high school graduate supporting a family of four. After three terms of Reaganomics ‘middle class’ was two college grads working full time. Also, $1 million in 1980 was still a vast fortune and nowadays it’s what a rich guy pays for a party.