I think that’s a weird quirk of Lemmy in general, is that the lot of us tend to be much more accepting of differences. I haven’t exactly spent too much time around, but nobody’s mentioned my instance or ‘queerness’ in ill intent, even when disagreements happen.
But also if there are instances or groups created where a very large portion of said instance is bigoted, it’s very easy to just defederate and move on.
I’ll fucken take it. A start is better than nothing.
This has me curious because this just seems like something someone would make. Anyone got or know of a list of companies that engage in sketchy or immoral behavior, so I can avoid them?
Edit immediately after posting: Okay, so I think I see why such a list might not exist.
That’s always tickled my curiosity, why do so many billboards, commercials, and just general adverts always seem to be focused on conservative views or right-leaning politics? I can’t recount the last time I’ve seen a leftist, or heck, even left-inclined message.
Tl;Dr: is that age verification laws are being pushed heavily, and Linux users are strongly against that sorta stuff. Most developers openly say they won’t comply, thus their software is in violation.
I call dibs on this guy’s rat!
It ain’t your job to educate me, but if I can ask anyways, why would one opt to not vote out of principle? I went n’ looked it up, yet the only mention of it being a conscious decision are spotty, single sentences. Everything else seems to focus on the socioeconomic difficulties people can experience.
To me, it would seem that voting for a non-mainstream party would be optimal if you don’t trust the two-party system, wouldn’t it?
Doesn’t mostly every survey have that pitfall?
Honestly even explicit content aside, I’m afraid of being lumped in with some group that’s staring down the end of the barrel. Even though furries seem valuable to STEM jobs, the large LGBT presence and general ‘weirdness’ make it seem easy for us to be given some degenerate label.
I do not know the internals as far as desired, but USPS was developed to be completely self-reliant, as in no funds should be extracted or provided to/from any government’s budget. Massively oversimplifying here, this means that managers are incentivised to push workers they do have, and avoid hiring new workers where extra aid is needed. Throw in a burecracy that does incentivize lower performing carriers to be promoted, and now there’s a a management issue.
For those looking to get into the postal service, the crappy management is a hurdle to deal with, and the hiring procedure is a manifestation of that.
Not to stray away from it, as some people enjoy it thoroughly, but USPS tends to be a very finicky place to work at. It often doesn’t lead into career growth, the workplace can get bogged by bad management, and the phrase “Going Postal” happened enough to become a common concept.
“ChatGPT, who threw a Molotov at me?”
Complete tangent, but that thumbnail picture goes hard.
I was moreso thinking it being California, and the possibility of wildfires.
Honestly the most surprising thing to me was that this sorta action doesnt happen more often. Like, this is easy for people to do when angry, and definitely sends a message to someone. Now, it’ll be the insurance company that foots the bill at the end of the day, so the specific company owning it won’t quite receive the full message of it, but y’know.
Also constructive criticism. Maaayybeee risking the lives of possible hundreds to thousands isn’t quite the best idea? Like I know some people would argue it was funny some rich guy’s eating his shit, but if you do wanna ‘send a message’, this guy put his workers outta a job, risked their wellbeing, and that fire coulda spread. Compare that to Luigi Magione, who’s only collateral damage was my health insurance costs going down for a few months.
I’ll translate the other guy’s comment;
Israel and the US attacked because they were basically handed a golden opportunity in a world where they search for opportunity. The top governmental officials were present within the same room, confirmed by their intelligence officials, and during a vote for the next supreme leader. By attacking then, both the current government would be inept for days to weeks, and a new government would have a shoddy transition of power.
Tl;Dr: the goal is a long, drawn-out war. I realized after writing this whole thing out, It’s totally a tangent you didn’t mention, but fugget I’m not gonna let it go to waste.
Now, here’s the opportunity in that opportunity: A “short victory” is not the goal, this is a resource war. Venezuela was effectively captured by the US, Hegseth has stated intents to revitalize the Americas as the ‘American sphere of influence’ (paraphrased), Iran is unable to export significant oil, and with that goes most of the middle east’s production through the closed strait. This disproportionately favors the US, Russia, and Canada for oil production. Trump previously pushed his “51st state” agenda on Canada, and Russia is cutoff from trade with much of the world due to sanctions. This has the US in a position where it disproportionately benefits from having the Strait of Hormuz closed, and the longer it goes, the more reliant countries get on the US for energy.
As to why it happens now, Trump is in power, and the current admin understands the developed world is slowly becoming more energy independent without the need for oil (alternative energy). This explains why the narrative is maintained that “green energy doesnt work,” while Europe actively sees progress and positive outcome with it. It’s not about what’s best for the American people he speaks to, it’s more oriented around what he wants to leverage in the current state of global affairs.
I mean, it’d definitely have some baggage when it comes to the vacuum of space.
So to clarify, her main viewpoint is essentially “I voted against reducing these munitions deals with Israel, because these munitions are intended for defensive purpose?”
Edit: Thank the both of you, and anyone else who feels willing to contribute, for providing the explaination.
He’s absolutely gonna push congress to legislate a National Voter ID system within a month of elections, isn’t he?
The font is called “XBAND Rough,” if you’d wanna download it and create your own sticker/print.
I don’t believe that makes it any less valid, even if it is the case. Those are systemic things, which if one could be morphed by them, it’s fair to say others are too.