Terrible analogy.

The library everyone built is still there, free of charge for everyone to use.

What AI companies have built is an assistant who has photographic memory and has read everything in the library.

You’re still free to use the library to find what you want, but the library is not using the Dewey decimal system.

You’re also free to build your own knowledge base using the information from the library if you want to, and charge for access or give it away for free.

FSD is a better driver than most people.

The first series was trash because they pretty much tried a shot for shot copy of the UK version. The second series was basically a reboot and was amazing from there on till about season 6 iirc

But we’re in a topic about supermarkets throwing their food away instead of donating it lol

Also it wouldn’t “fail” in court because like I said, it is limited liability. It can fine you no liability sometimes, full liability other times.

No one is “championing” anything, merely explaining what prevents what is being discussed.

So for food that doesn’t last a week to begin with?

That leaves plenty of room to be sued actually. It provides limited liability, not zero liability, and would be put to the test almost immediately.

The answer is yes. It does.

No it doesn’t. You still have to click delete on the file that you want to delete. Confirm boxes don’t even need to show the name of the file you’re deleting, just confirm if you want to delete it. When you empty the recycle bin it doesn’t ask you if you’re sure you’d like to delete x, y, and z file names, for example.

Give away perfectly good in date food instead of selling it?

Non-breaking isn’t meaningless - it means it doesn’t break anything. It means it doesn’t affect users, and thus it’s not going to be high priority or be enough to block a release.

So they’re…. in profit.

Gotta try find a way to make space X sound bad, right?

Bet you wish you held it now though. Up about 7x since it first opened.

Because it’s basically illegal for them to give it away. If they gave away expired food they would be sued to oblivion within a week because current laws make them liable for any sickness/death that occurs from it.

It’s not. Broken means it doesn’t work. Everything about deleting files works. The file you told it to delete gets deleted. The only “issue”, in the absolute least problematic use of the word, is that it displays an internal name rather than the regular file name of the file as it’s being deleted.

It’s not broken if it works exactly as it’s supposed to.

Yes. The left are in power in all of those countries, and they’re pushing through all these authoritarian surveillance and censorship laws.

Read the article:

the confirmation dialog displays a cryptic internal filename, such as $Rxxxxx.ext, instead of the original filename, such as realfilename.txt.

Broken means it doesn’t work. Everything about the recycling bin functionally works.

What exactly is “broken” about the recycling bin because of this?

Does the recycling bin still work?

Does the right file get deleted?

You’ve got a strange definition of broken.

Developer written unit tests likely wouldn’t even catch that bug with the recycling bin, because it doesn’t even matter what the text says when it’s being deleted. It’s not a breaking bug. It wouldn’t hold up a release. It might have even been found in QA and might have a super low priority ticket to fix it because again, it’s non breaking and doesn’t affect anything in any way.

You don’t understand how software dev QA works, clearly.

That was the main promise lol