Not at all. Never really have been though and it’s been 43 years so at least I’m used to it.
Thank you. Surprisingly unvulgar and not at all cynical
Not at all. Never really have been though and it’s been 43 years so at least I’m used to it.
Thank you. Surprisingly unvulgar and not at all cynical
Heh. My brother’s and i have beat it.
It wasn’t so much unfinished as they decided the problems with that particular level were worth keeping as it was. Classic it’s not a bug it’s a feature. They decided it was acceptable and added to the game even if it was not intended by design
You need to update your vocabulary comrade. There may be new definitions of the word racism. Remember literally no longer only literally means literally. What a time we live in.
Okay Ojay okay. Help me out. Why are you claiming that this is the question?
“The question was: how does someone find out something is peer reviewed”
Please literally show where you see this being asked. It was not asked in the top comment, nor is it necessary to ask. I don’t understand why you feel it is silly or unnecessary as it is very clearly used for a specific purpose when i read the top comment.
Again you are wrong. It was not the question of the top comment you responded to. That was a follow up question that is irrelevant because the comment you that started this discussion cleanly clearly and unambiguously removed any need to discuss how to find out if something is peer reviewed by the first words they started the comment with.
If it is peer reviewed…
And they gave an example of something that you could do to further verify a peer reviewed paper. You can replicate the experiment and get the same results but then offered an example where there might be a problem with only reproducing the results, to them anyway
No one said it wasn’t correct… Why did you even bring that up?!? You accused the person you first replied to it, describing a process that isn’t the peer review process, skipping that they used the process they described only on something that is already peer reviewed…
I was(perhaps a poor attempt) trying to be a bit silly but pointing out a mistake you made accusing them of something they didnt do. But you just dont want to let it go and keep drilling deeper. Its quite surprising to me you can’t just say, oh whoops, and carry on
Your reasoning doesn’t matter if it’s being applied to the wrong problem.
This is not about OP.
Okay i laughed
Has nothing to do with OPs question. You missed the very first sentence to the comment your first responded to
if its peer reviewed.
You kinda glossed right over that didnt you? Maybe an edit is in your future?
I dont have an answer other than vet with an authority you trust (be it wikipedia, a teacher a friend, a parent)
But this is not a stupid question. Its probably the most important question when making a decision in this modern techno era to have an answer for yourself
Thrills? You want thrills? Get to that one god damned level on battletoads. Good good did that put you on the edge of your seat
5 Man NHL '94
I would never have said i love reggae, but i love 8 bit and this is very good. I will now say that i love this reggae.
Thanks for sharing
My problem with this is ive listened to pink floyd my whole life. I’ve been told how amazing it is but have never experienced something that everyone else experiences.
It’s like someone telling me they believe in ghosts because of an experience they have had that i haven’t and then telling me the story of their experience. Great story, but needs that experience to make it real.
So Floyd is an obvious suggestion, and that is not in any way meant to deter anyone from seeking it, but is one that is potentially problematic if it has been over hyped before you experience it in an shattered state of mind.
As a came to it in middle age fledgling stoner i feel the closest i can get to a stoned floyd experience that other people seem to be able to have, only really happens for me with finding something new that im not already familiar with, or at least that i dont have a long history with built up expectations. But not having had that stoned Floyd experience I’ve heard so much about, i could be way off if my amazing experiences with other music aren’t the same type of experience.
(Like we can all share experiences about a type of food, like spaghetti as an example, we can collectively recognize the spaghetti experience but ill never find my mom s spaghetti anywhere other than my mom’s table, even if i follow her recipe, even if the only detectable difference is that i know she didn’t make it, it won’t be the same experience)
But i think the pursuit of that experience even if you don’t find it is still awesome. And here is a picture of me trying to have that experience with a couple extra steps: outside in a hammock with a “cosmic” laser projector pointed at a patio cover. Highly recommend
Edit: spelling. Also shattered was meant to be altered but left it as is because it was a fun error that i liked
…we have tiny computers in our pockets, we can travel the world in a matter of hours, we have set foot on the fucking moon.
All brought to you by capitalism. Is it really such a surprise that money rules everything?
If you can’t find something better(because it works and people won’t give it up to go back) then why would things change?
Everyone on the bottom is forced to see what those on top have. Especially in this modern age.
“Why do i have to sacrifice when I’m barely surviving, when those people have way more than ill ever have?”
For the greater good right? Well its become bought sold and corrupted and is now The Greater Good©®™
Life is now a product because it was never prevented from being more than that.
Kind want to find a fun drug fueled orgy cult and disappear for about 4 years
Pretty sure it always had been. Catholic church been doing that for millenia
Bringing an illegal substance to work is even dumber. Even if it is legal its pretty dumb to bring it to work
Imagine how much healthier things would be if ads were illegal and using them was punishable by having your business auctioned off and the proceeds going to free legal services for the bottom 50% of society