I can only hope it was with a side of fava beans and a nice Chianti.
I am trying to focus on posting source documents, as opposed to someone else’s reporting on source documents.
I can only hope it was with a side of fava beans and a nice Chianti.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism
Because you clearly do not know what that term means.
Trump was never going to win Illinois anyway.
… willful idiots we had this time …
Oh, there were plenty of those in 1918, too.
Carroll’s case is federal, this one is New York State.
I am right now sitting on a Steelcase Series 1, and while it doesn’t have great lumbar support, it is far better than any shitty $150 “gaming” chair, and is right in your price range brand new.
This is for the tax case; Carroll’s judgment for the most recent one was $83.3M. They’re both civil cases, though this one is NY State, and Carroll’s is federal.
In either case, if the bond amount is not posted, there is no appeal, and assets can be seized to fulfill the legal consequences.
I read The Fountainhead instead, and it was interesting enough to keep me reading. “Okay, there’s a lot of setup of characters and circumstances going on, I am curious to know how this plays out,” and then it just … doesn’t. It was all a lead-up to a long, weakly written, and plainly stupid monologue about how completely ruthless all people should be at all times, only ever thinking in the shortest term about themselves.
I closed that book wondering why Ayn Rand was famous for anything beyond being a shitbag, when I was young enough to be kind of a shitbag myself.
The legal term for Engoron’s ruling (New York state civil fraud judgment) is “undertaking.” In the Carroll case (Kaplan, federal defamation), it’s “damages,” a large portion of which are punitive damages.
The E. Jean Carroll defamation case was in federal court.
No true Christian, amirite?
The meat:
“Having argued to the jury that President Trump has great financial resources, Plaintiff is in no position to contradict herself now and contend that she requires the protection of a bond during the brief period while post-trial motions are pending,” he huffs. “This fact nullifies risk to the judgment creditor and weighs heavily in favor of an unsecured stay.”
Only problem with that is that it’s not Plaintiff who is requiring a bond pending appeal. It is the United States of America.
He slipped real hard during his presidential bid. Remember how his VP pick was Sarah Palin, for example.
deleted by creator
Post only links to articles
Finally! You fuckers want to eat “steak,” well you’re going to have it with a delicate murder sauce.
The scourge in my grade school was Rubik’s Cubes.
There is no more perfect image for the circumstances.
EVERYONE MUST REGISTER EACH SEXUAL LIAISON WITH THE STATE
That’s just God telling you to go to the bad gateway.