K

We would also accept “Reject all”

The issue for me is this line, which still gets it wrong, because it should either replace the word “legislatures” with “professionals in the field” or say it should be done in consultation with.

the majority wrote that decisions on emerging policy issues like transgender care are generally better left to legislatures rather than judges.

Yes. There’s a lot of projection going on here. While I understand that art allows us to see and project ourselves onto it, I don’t believe a movie about a plastic fashion doll is quite the same.

Because the way Threads works is almost seamlessly allowing existing Instagram users to create a Threads account. There is no corollary for Masto or Lemmy or any Fed entities to do something similar.

It’s corporate synergy, baby.

It really depends. If you’re in a smaller instance and you look at the global view, you’re going to see more of Mr. 16.5% than one of the smaller ones.

Though I suspect usage patterns and the way users interact with instances beyond theirs will play a role. But, in an immediate sense, I could see larger instances having a bigger voice (so to speak).

And now I’ll waffle and say it’s all a crapshoot because people are unpredictable and social media platforms even more so.

3067 is a lot of ways to slice half a pie. I’d consider even 16.5% (or whatever the top dog of that 3 with 50% has) to be domination.

You probably got banned because you referred to it as being from “The Office”, when it’s originally from “SNL”

Is your sorting the same for both (new, hot, top [day, week, month])?

I especially enjoy that, no matter how much he drives the value down, he’s always going to owe the full value of the loans.