Terrible take, she’s not a politician and not interested.

Now Gretchen Whitmer might have been a better candidate had we been able to have a primary.

I mean, yes and no. There’s biology that drives human behavior, as much as we want to pretend otherwise and physics are responsible for scarcity.

Given our biological programming and scarcity of resources there isn’t an economic system that can “be fair and equal” at any scale beyond hunter gatherer tribes.

The numbers, any way you slice it, are 50/50 right now.

Pennsylvania is anybody’s game, Georgia is ever so slightly in Trump’s favor but even winning Georgia won’t get Harris over the line on its own if she loses Pennsylvania.

This is terrifying, honestly.

Trump won Michigan by less then 10,000 votes in 2016. Tightest presidential outcome in the states history.

And that was after Hillary both ignored and insulted the rust belt.

The polls say otherwise.

She REALLY needs to move the needle in Pennsylvania or magically overcome worse numbers in Georgia and some other state to have a chance in hell of hitting 270.

It’s shaping up to be a nail biter to the bitter end.

God help us if SCOTUS chose to steal it for him like the 2000 election.

Why would we move on from his admitting to what we all know, his goal is the end of our Republic.

What the hell are you talking about, we should NOT move on, that’s been the problem all along.

That would be great, she’s been a great governor.

Only thing that could be better is a Whitmer/Harris ticket or even a Whitmer/Shapiro ticket.

Even 20 years ago Linux was easier to install then Windows.

Last time I recall Linux being tricky was like late 90s.

Obviously you didn’t read what I wrote, because it is not a construction.

We are animals, we have two sexes. Those sexes are different physically, including brain development.

Human genders are the typical manifestation of our sexual dimorphism. Atypical examples are why we’ve constructed the idea that gender and sex are different, to be socially inclusive to those few outliers.

I mean, entirely false, but ok.

Gender is very much real, you just seem to have a false perception of what the word means.

Most of us do very much have a gender, it is a very small minority who feels their gender does not match their sex, and smaller still are those who, like you apparently, feel no sense of gender at all.

Being outside the common experience doesn’t mean you get to disregard the common experience any more then we should disregard your experience.

It’s a terrible term for very real problem of toxic gender roles. I’m not sure if you meant to imply that these roles are only reenforced by other men, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.

Men and women reenforce these gender roles against men and boys, promoting the poor behavior.

Then you are not very bright.

Or more likely you’re very disingenuous with this comment.

I mean, you totally forgot how 9/11 changed our ENTIRE outlook on the world.

Competition is great, a company that can’t produce a quality product and ships a CAR with beta level software that can’t update OTA is NOT competition.

The auto industry is highly unfavorable to startups, the competition you want will come from the old ICE OEMs.

Or in/on my ears!

Hair falling outta my head, but if I don’t trim my eyebrows I’ll end up looking like a sheep dog.

Because AI is the new because blockchain.

I miss my youth.

Bifocals suck.

She chose to become part of the royal family, she knew what that entails.

Frankly being in the tabloids isn’t payment enough for what the get as royalty.

I can’t comprehend why the people of the UK put up with that level of bullshit. The rest of the world gave up on monarchy over a century ago.

Men get sexually assaulted as well, difference is nobody gives a shit.

Political extremists, such as yourself, are exhausting.

It’s like talking to a religious fanatic, there’s no reasoning with someone who’s made a decision based on emotion instead of logic.