If they succeed, it’ll be in spite of their greed, not because of it.

Boeing said

Do we really trust them at this point? I mean, if true that’s great, but they’ve lied before.

Speaking as an aerospace engineer, of course. But it’d be a worthy um…expenditure?

Let’s just launch him into the Sun.

Don’t send Elon, though. I’d rather we not contaminate the planet.

At some point, really hoping the US government just disqualifies Boeing as a potential supplier. I was ready to celebrate that Boeing finally managed to not fuck something up, but alas, my hopes were somehow too high. Good luck to the astronauts on re-entry.

I think you’re being a tad unreasonable. Ever the cynic myself, sometimes things just go according to plan.

Yup. I wonder if Boeing might be selected to supply the crew capsule for whatever comes after the Artemis programme.

There’s almost a zero chance that happens.

To the shock of…

crickets chirping

TIL. I thought C was older than that.

Wasn’t a lot of Voyager’s code written in C?

Yeah, I mean it’s basically running on a toaster. Crazy how much radiation the Voyager probes have to have sustained.

¿Por qué no los dos?

Easy to learn? Sir, who’s your dealer because they’re selling you some strong stuff…

I just want to give kudos to the engineers who are working with fifty-year-old software to reprogram entirely a spacecraft that’s nearly a light-day away. Holy shit.

Yeah, not to mention the procession of the planet’s star around the galactic centre would be an absolute bitch. The best we could hope for in terms of any craft’s travel time is likely around 160 years, and even then only with major advancements in propulsion technology.

I was just thinking that since the centre of those was on/in the Sun, this shift might make a difference, but that makes sense.

Is this going to necessitate a redefinition of the heliosheath or heliopause, since those are partially based on the solar magnetic field?