It’s hilarious that you

A. Got mad enough to post about it.

B. Considered disrespecting this person you know nothing about by posting a picture of them taken without their knowledge.

C. Lack the empathy or intellectual capacity to imagine a world in which they’re justified for their behaviour because you wanted the experience to go a certain preconceived way.

D. Still think you somehow have a point, when in fact your stewing is your own fault.

What’s your KDA?

You’re once again taking my words, which have always been about this online discussion and the words being used in it and using it to paint an inaccurate portrait that I do not care about women’s trauma irl. Patently untrue. I care about how people jump at every opportunity to disparage the other sex online through offensive generalisations, then hide it behind a veneer of thin justifications, such as “you wouldn’t feel hurt if you weren’t the target”, or “see? you’re proving our point that all men are evil and suck”, or whatever the argument of the day is.

That’s my problem. It’s a bandwagon effect that won’t stop because the group being the target of the accusations online is immediately targeted when they defend themselves. See a familiar pattern? This is why it needs to stop. You claim to want empathy from both sides, well, it starts with stopping the us vs. them nonsense and aggressive generalising about all men.

There’s a little thing called self-reinforcing positive attitudes, but without breaking the cycle you feed the opposite behaviour.

Removed by mod

Yes, but you’re talking about IRL situations. Why can’t you differentiate online? It’s so easy to say that you need to be careful because of rapists. Instead you spread a message of being careful around all men. It’s disingenuous, and it leads to ostracization and a loneliness epidemic like the one that’s currently and actively fuelling the movements you despise.

Removed by mod

even if they are not correct for every single person in the generalised group

That’s your problem, you’re willing to lump everyone together. I can also go around looking at every minutia and flaw I can find from different people and lumping them all together under the “Women” umbrella, but I don’t because I’m not fucking stupid. Tell me again the percentage of the male population that does each and every single different thing you claim all men do? That’s right, it’s a fraction of a percentage. Most men are good. And yet “all men” enter your generalisation.

Removed by mod

Every single sentence you say that starts with “Men…” is sexist. Get that in your damn head. It doesn’t matter what you say after that, the generalisation is sexist as fuck. Now go learn something or gtfo.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Lmao at the crazies replying to you as if they couldn’t bear the idea that the argument is empty and could be flipped on its head.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

deleted by creator

Wow! Sample size: 1. Sure showed them, buddy.

Clearly not bi, btw, you’re a misandrist. Congratulations 🎉!

There’s nothing genuine about your rotten misandry. Take it, and yourself, out of here.

Removed by mod

Ah yes, you look at the entirety of the male population, say “there’s no positives”, and still think you have a point 😂😂😂.

It’s like you can’t even wrap your own head around the sheer amount of misandry oozing from your mouth.

Removed by mod