The current president, usually very talkative and opportunistic, took the opportunity to dissappear as the scandal with his party’s PM grew, and didn’t even show up when the blackout crisis happened, when the government also disappeared.
China reports bumper April exports ahead of crucial trade talks with US
Heron Lim, an economist at Moody’s Analytics, said that, while China’s trade with the US dropped 21 per cent year on year in April, it rose by an equal percentage with south-east Asian nations and 8 per cent with the EU.
Orcas, sharks, fires… someone should make a religion out of Moses being back.
With regards to the deal itself, at least Ukraine got an endpoint clause now, the deal is only set to last for 10 years.
Someone told him it doesn’t matter once American capital owns them.
Influential at an intangible spiritual feeling of not giving up. You’re right, it’s not material, it’s not measurable, and maybe even not that relevant. It could be me overcorrecting on western despair that isn’t going to change or become easier.
Someone like Xi led the country, along with their government and their party, but unless I’m ignorant on that as well, others inspired the people to change with it and make it work. In the same way that its not reasonable to measure it in members or population numbers when insiders dislike and outsiders appreciate, especially with the former pope.
But, again, I’m probably miss-evaluating a few things, including personal despair.
Fair enough. Thanks for that, good post. I’m seeing that I was thinking about the influence on captivating some people into rethinking what they think about the reactionary path, from whether they should reject it, to whether they should reject it in a different way, and what progress and dreams were seen as acceptable to lose in what turned out not to be temporary, let alone necessary.
And I’m used to and don’t know how to talk about spirituality, which obviously isn’t as important as material analysis, and sometimes overcorrect both the world’s and personal feelings of despair.
I understood it and was going with influential as inspirational and motivational to the largest and most diverse group of people, not the most radical. Maybe chinese and neighbors alone beat the numbers for Xi, which whom I don’t think vibes much populism or direct impact. It’s not “some cool antiwar stuff”, which is kind of the official line of the church, it’s the words about capitalism, inequality, climate change, billionaires, financial sector, calling Gaza every single day, and the limited but huge shifts about communism, feminism, and LGB (missed something there, I know), all while at the top of the reactionary central of the west for centuries.
Actual existing communism is great, but, I don’t know, doesn’t feel it moved the techtonic plates as much.
Maybe its a bit western-centric, but a local random good person I follow on xitter pointed out that the late pope was the most influential leftist of the last decade. Flawed, like any human, but yeah, that hit.
No qualified workers, no supply chain, no logistics, no capital interest in investing in production. My math says hell no.
So did legacy media. The temporary “ceasefire” and the temporary openings in reaction to Trump seem to have broken the dam of ignoring that a holocaust with western support is ongoing, it isn’t going back in the bottle. And also constant escalation, of course.
No illusion that things will change soon, though.