A lot of them are on job Visas and cannot easily leave.

Where? I feel Google has gone way downhill but the Bing based search engines haven’t seemed any better.

And doesn’t this basically admit to the crime?

Why was this written like this? It makes no sense. I’ll git blame it and ask them what’s going on. Oh it’s me…

Isn’t new York flooded right now?

I just peeked at the docs and right off the bat I don’t like how they have conflicting attributes like hx-get and hx-post. What happens if both are set at the same time? Why not just have hx-method?

Because it’s the country the company is based in.

Loyalty is a two way street and when it comes to jobs the company’s loyalty should come first.

By the end of the meeting you have 10 more questions and no answers and more meetings to discuss the new questions

But they’re both Walt Disney, so does this say that he did character voices while masturbating?

Can you be more specific? I’d like to know what it’s missing.

I think you’re misunderstanding what I mean. Early Access is a newer term for getting paid access to a game early. Open beta is an older term but was used for free access to a game early for testing purposes. They used to have different meanings which is why early access was created as a new term to distinguish it from a beta. Calling paid early access a beta is intentionally misleading.

It used to be called early access. At least it wasn’t a misleading term.

Getting over it?

Yes, it’s still a transpiler, I’m not saying it isn’t, but what I mean is that it doesn’t add any functionally specific to the typescript language. There’s a transpiler for TS that doesn’t even do any type checking at all and just does the type stripping and back porting. But of course, that’s not why people use typescript. All the features that are actually important to typescript could be done through a linter instead. If type annotations were added to JavaScript you could get most of typescript’s features with linting rules and just handle back porting in a more standard way.

It’s basically a book you can talk to. A book can contain incredibly knowledge, but it’s a preserve artifact of intelligence, not intelligence.

Agreed. I’m not defending phones in class, just pointing out that there’s more work that can be done with lesson plans as well.

I fully support kicking kids off their phones in class, I don’t think any lesson no matter how engaging can compete with that. I’m not supposed to be on my phone during meetings, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to ban phones from class. I was just commenting that work can be done to make lessons more engaging when phones aren’t involved. There’s of course a limit to what you can do, and some subjects are just inherently harder to get kids into, like statistics. But seriously good on you for doing that. I’m sure that while it didn’t have perfect engagement, it was far better than just teaching it to the book.

Just curious, is there a place you can share that lesson plan to other teachers? It’d be a shame for all that work you did to not get to be used in other classrooms as well.

You can increase motivation to learn by making lessons more engaging even if it’s a subject they’re not personally interested in. But making lessons more interesting and engaging is not easy and we can’t expect all teachers to have the skills and resources to do the research and development needed to produce lesson plans that are really interesting. I think it could be improved by putting more money into developing interesting lesson plans centrally and distributing the materials to teachers to follow instead of just producing dry curriculums. Teachers need support.

Learn to make your own, then sell them on Etsy, wait, oh no!