Probably every single person with knee problems.
Probably every single person with knee problems.
> binom.test(11,n=24, alternative = "two.sided")
Exact binomial test
data: 11 and 24
number of successes = 11, number of trials = 24, p-value = 0.8388
alternative hypothesis: true probability of success is not equal to 0.5
95 percent confidence interval:
0.2555302 0.6717919
sample estimates:
probability of success
0.4583333
Probably not. Or at least we can’t conclude that from the data. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I didn’t know that Rómendacil II was born with another name. Got the rest. :)
Or more likely torus-earthers, unless the gluing is reversed.
Depends on the kind of blur. Some kinds can indeed be almost perfectly removed if you know the used blurring function, others are destructive. But, yes, don’t take that chance. Always delete/paint over sensitive information.
Source: we had to do just that in a course I took a long time ago.
Mir hei zum glück üses jährleche alpweekend vo letscht Wuche no chönne uf Disi schiebe. :)
Di letschte drü Täg isch ja eigentlech sehr guet gsi, und ih dene paar Stund wo gwitteret hett, heimer zumindescht äh sehr schöni Ussicht gha.
EVEN IN DEATH I SERVE THE
OMNISSIAHORNITHOLOGIST