I’m here to explore gender, looking for affirmative community to be honest with.
This is really ironic. We’re surprised that the AI says what we have all put out there already for it to consume. remember it doesn’t care, it can’t. But having it say those things makes us think: there, we are right … the AI said so. And Bernie anthropomorphizes the AI throughout, which also gives it power.
There’s good stuff in the video that people need to hear, but there’s danger, too.
Infomaniak are good. Awful ux but good on other stuff.
Take radiology: there is some evidence that AI can sometimes identify solid-mass tumors that some radiologists miss. Look, I’ve got cancer. Thankfully, it’s very treatable, but I’ve got an interest in radiology being as reliable and accurate as possible.
Let’s say my hospital bought some AI radiology tools and told its radiologists: “Hey folks, here’s the deal. Today, you’re processing about 100 X-rays per day. From now on, we’re going to get an instantaneous second opinion from the AI, and if the AI thinks you’ve missed a tumor, we want you to go back and have another look, even if that means you’re only processing 98 X-rays per day. That’s fine, we just care about finding all those tumors.”
If that’s what they said, I’d be delighted. But no one is investing hundreds of billions in AI companies because they think AI will make radiology more expensive, not even if that also makes radiology more accurate. The market’s bet on AI is that an AI salesman will visit the CEO of Kaiser and make this pitch: “Look, you fire nine out of 10 of your radiologists, saving $20m a year. You give us $10m a year, and you net $10m a year, and the remaining radiologists’ job will be to oversee the diagnoses the AI makes at superhuman speed – and somehow remain vigilant as they do so, despite the fact that the AI is usually right, except when it’s catastrophically wrong.
“And if the AI misses a tumor, this will be the human radiologist’s fault, because they are the ‘human in the loop’. It’s their signature on the diagnosis.”
Um, I was just sharing my experience with an xps. You have different experience, with a different xps model I’d guess. I’m glad you’re happy with it!
I didn’t even share the worst part of my experience: when it died it just died, refused to turn on. Immediate brick, no warning. This has happened to quite a few people I found, from frantic searching at the time.
I’ve bought dell for 20 years but their quality has been falling for the last decade, in my opinion and based on having bought about a dozen (for various people).
I’ll never buy an xps again. Last one needed pretty much everything replacing, and within 3 years dell stopped manufacturing the battery!!
$2k on a laptop that’s a brick within 3 years?
Sorry, I can’t offer any help, it’s been 40 years since I did 6052, on a BBC B!! Would love to know what your interest in it is?
I get really sick of rich people promising their latest product will mean 4/3/2 day working weeks, and when others parrot this nonsense I just despair.
Leaving aside the dispute over “AI” and it’s actual effect on efficiency…
If efficiency savings were all that was needed we would already be there. There’s been hundreds of such advances. But all that happens is the wealthy get more wealth. They will always find work for us in those “saved days”, and will increase our costs until we have to work those days to survive.
I use the hybrid: suspend to ram, then after 2 hours, automatically suspend to disk - in the final state it uses zero power. And, if you have encrypted your drive (you DO encrypt your drives, right?!) then you need to enter passphrase on resume from hibernate, so safer if device was nicked.
I agree with negligent! Using suspend to ram for extended periods, eg nightly or over weekend will kill your battery life.
Yeah we did that, but at least it took us six months or so too get the photos developed…