Caring for a family member (caregiving isn’t actually just limited to family members FYi) includes but not limited; dealing with financing, scheduling, transit, meal planning and prep, etc. you’re the persons care taker, you do everything they would normally be doing. There’s every day tasks that are relevant to every job that’s out there. There’s a reason why people can’t hold jobs while being a caretaker after all… or does this mean absolutely nothing to people?

Tell me you think being a caretaker means sitting around doing nothing all day….

Dealing with finances, scheduling, planning and transit aren’t relevant to a sales position? That’s an interesting take.

Do you not realize what being a caregiver involves?

Actually, caring for others, is quite a relevant work trait for even software engineering. Don’t want a bunch of people who can’t handle communicating with others or can’t get someone to do something.

It’s all I how you spin it, and clearly you aren’t using this for anything but a lie if you think it’s not valid work experience.

Being a caregiver is relevant work experience, quite sad that some people think caring for others isn’t relevant for a large portion of work…

Talk about not trying to sell yourself wow. If shows a whole bunch of characteristics that are known for employability. Wild you wouldn’t want to show that you don’t mind putting others first, can work in a stressful environment, caring, works well with others, etc. m

There’s also money involved, transit, you can always find something relevant in caregiving to any potential career.

Or do you think caregiving is just sitting around all day doing nothing?

Being a caregiver is its own work experience, you should list it. How is it any different than the paid jobs that do the same thing?

It also shows your willing to put your own stuff aside and help.

I guess if you’re just using this as a lie, you wouldn’t realize all the actual benefits something like this could do for your resume.

You get benefits for that (in some places), and why would you not list that on the resume ahead of time to explain the gap?

Omitting Information is the largest red flag you can provide.

On the other hand, having a one year gap without any work raises its own red flags. Need a good reason to have large swaths of not working.

Kidde and first alert are kinda on par with each other, why they are sold at the big box stores.

Anything with a metal head that’s serviceable, I have a strike first in my home, one of the cheaper “commercial” call them brands.

If you don’t know any, condos and stores have them, look at one of their service tags and give them a call, most shouldn’t have an issue making a sale and potentially repeat service business.

Fire code requires their service, so most commercial places should be following along, but that depends on also how much your FD and jurisdictions cares to enforce the rules.

Now you have, in our pantry corner.

Every 6 years it needs a 6-year service and every 12 years a hydro test. Other than that it can sit up off the floor anywhere you want.

Just want to point out.

Kidde does not have good running with extinguishers.

Get a badger or Amerex, and get it from an actual supplier, they’ll know the good ones and keep it serviced for you too.

You mean the link you provided that doesn’t talk about sex crimes at all? Thats what you want to support that strict liability applies to sex crime? The link that says it doesn’t? You sure?

Your point was strict liability should apply here in This case, when asked why, you provided strict liability. Now the at we hopefully found out why, you can educate yourself, that it usually doesn’t apply for sexual crimes… that’s the topic.

Should someone pissing in the trees have a blanket law applies to them, we know they exist, I’m laughing and pointing out how stupid it is to apply it in situations like pissing in a corner.

Zero, zero results for sex in your link you claim specifies it. Fucking amazing lmfao.

So crotches are considered inherently “ultrahazardous” since that’s the metric it says applies. Good take away.

That’s quite a bit different than someone pulling their weiner out and peeing against a tree where no one can see anything. I hope you can see this.

Not for sex offenders like pissing in public, of course it exists in other areas of law, but those aren’t applicable to all other areas.

Source for EU? And for sex offences atleast.

Sounds like you’re trying to apply other law areas with strict liability to this one blanketly, which isn’t how it works…z

As a semi aside blanket laws are no good anywhere, you’re not advocating for blanket laws are you…? Hope not.

If it originated there, why doesn’t Canada have it lmfao.

I can actually make that argument, and a very good one that intent is very important.

Of course, that’s not a thing in every country. This is the same country that applies murder to criminals when cops kill people, so not surprised they wouldn’t care about intent for other laws.

What a wild fucking place lmfao.

This is the same place that charges criminals for murder that police do yeah…?

Maybe the issue is the basis of the laws in your country to even begin with…?

These aren’t normal laws in other countries fyi.

Intent matters for laws that are meant to be used properly.

Unless they intentionally exposed themselves, pissing in public shouldn’t net you a sex offenders list standing.

Most (proper laws) laws require intent. Unless they purposely exposed themselves… Peeing in a corner exposes nothing and doesn’t fit any definition of “intent”. Why would this suddenly be any different?

These blanket laws are usually to get vagrants being in an alley.

It’s not a double standard, it’s a blanket law that shouldn’t exist to begin with lmfao.

Pissing in public shouldn’t net you a sex offender list ANYWHERE, where is the intent to expose to someone else or a minor? But bloviate about double standards I guess… yeesh lmfao.