Yeah good luck to southeast states during hurricane season and Texas during Ted Cruz Cancun season

I was thinking the same thing, I always drop the flour by a bit to get that effect. The only way to make chocolate chip cookies imo

I’d even be happy with there being a choice between “either release tools needed to unlock and run services necessary to function OR release all source code to public domain so someone else is able to fix and rebuild the software as necessary”

If I pay for something they shouldn’t be able to disable it

I bought a Sun Microsystems 24" widescreen CRT for $400 on eBay back in 2003ish? iirc. It was 100lbs and delivered on a pallet lol. There’s a reason why they didn’t get very big and were mostly 4:3. 1920x1200 and like 30" deep! But, they did exist!

They should make the dodging and parying soulslike. They really wanted parying to be used in rebirth but it feels so bad.

I was not familiar with this historical fact, thanks for the info! That’s definitely a good example of why it shouldn’t bar someone outright.

12 peers can be coerced. If he still runs the rest of the country should be sufficient to not vote for him if he is undeserving of being elected. In theory it should be more difficult just by way of having more scrutiny into the type of person he is to the voters.

And they should again.

But a government that potentially is nefariously attempting to block a candidate shouldn’t be able to bar someone from being elected.

eg. An English loyalist blocks George Washington from being president by fraudulently getting him convicted of a felony; is that a reasonable thing we should have codified in the Constitution?

Do I want trump to be elected? Hell no. I also don’t feel like we should go down the road where a political opponent can block someone from running illegitimately, either.

Possibly, but why allow the possibility in the first place? The idea was that the voters and electors would ultimately decide

So, let’s say a political party is somehow at fault for charging and getting a verdict of an opponent. This would make it very easy to block anyone from running against the party in power if they so choose.

The founding fathers saw how much of an issue this would be so limited the reasons for blocking someone from running for office. I don’t think hush money is a good reason (though, doing so to block info that would make him lose an election I think should be but that will be up to the court)

Yeah I feel the same way. I’d love to see this chuckle fuck shut the hell up for the rest of my life but I also love seeing him get handed his ass because he can’t keep his mouth shut lol

I’d give all three of mine to this guy.

Sorry for your loss ;(

I can’t even use my smart card because Ubuntu keeps trying to install the snap version of Firefox which can’t access the hardware. Why does it keep swapping out every time I update releases? Why won’t it let me be happy?! /cry

Not sure why it matters. Ignore the links and don’t click them if you don’t want to. They’re still posting content, why did it actually matter other than some moral high ground for “pure” content or whatever you want to tell yourself.

As long as it isn’t copy pasted from some professional site and is at least the person posting their own stuff, I don’t care what their reasoning behind posting is.

Seems simple enough. He refuses, find him guilty, take control of any assets in the United States, and deport him. I don’t see the issue.

I drive into an on-site location a few times a year at most and I 100% consider any time traveling as work time.

Honestly, I’m not really a fan of the formatting and syntax of Python but I agree, it is a fine choice for scripting things quickly if you don’t mind the language itself.

The biggest issue I have with it are all the incompatible versions, juggling modules, having some other random thing with a ridiculous configuration, where a bash script would be infinitely easier. Anything more complicated and Python is just too much of a headache.

This isn’t jeopardy! 🤣

deleted by creator