From the article, seems the Canadian border guard applied the rules. They are not responsible for the state of the US

Decentralisation take different forms and they seems to only accept 3 established cryptocurrency, I don’t think this set a bad example.

Depend the country, France have their own transaction systems and do not rely on MasterCard nor Visa directly. (CB network)

Are you discussing with the bloc right now? Just seems like you don’t get it. Enjoy election day :)

Only taking into account the equalization in the calculus seems a bit limited, they are others factors that allow economic growth like access to cheap energy, transport, educated workforce, defense, etc… Believing that so many peoples vote because they want to throw a tantrum seems shortsighted if you want to unite peoples and believe Quebec should be part of Canada. We give you money so you should just shut the fuck up won’t build a nation. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t believe the equalization system seems fair, but the condescending tone won’t convince peoples to change.

For point 1 : From my understanding, it is a bit more than not signing a piece of paper. Not participating in the signature of a founding document like a constitution seems like a good recipe to create resentment long term. If it was just an admin task to sign it, why not re-open that document for signature ? I’m not even judging the situation that lead to this, just the impact it has today. For point 2 : While I don’t disagree that it’s a bit odd to have a party at the federal level that defend provincial interest, there is an underlying issue that lead peoples to vote for them. And no one is really interested to have this embarassing discussion 😅 For point 3 : I’m not knowledgeable enough to say if Quebec receive or give more, even if I doubt that this is a black and white answer

It’s not because you don’t like the party that it should not get visibility. You can’t be for democracy and against giving visibility to a party that represent a non negligeable percentage of the population. If that party is gaining such popularity, maybe there is an underlying issue that drive it, like why one province did not get to sign the constitution 🫣

Any concrete proof this happened ?

From the article : “However, the EU, together with Kyiv, plans to propose specific favourable adjustments for Ukraine thereafter.”

Sorry, what is the context ?

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I’m highlighting that EU’s deterrance is interpreted as a threat by Russian, who try to expand their border by mean of war (or special military operation 🤣) and spend 30% of their government’s budget toward military readiness, because they prepare for war against other countries.

Most points are laughable, including “Macron’s nuclear remarks: The French president proposed sharing nuclear deterrents within Europe and only stopped short of declaring war on the Russian Federation.” Why does our deterrence feel like a threat for Russia ? What are you planning with 30% of your government’s spending on military ? 🤣

Your article do looks like Russian propaganda

Copium from Tesla bag holder