• GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Bro, what point are you actually arguing against? The person you replied to never made a point about research bureaucracy.

          Google ignoratio elenchi

            • lunarul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Capitalism is provably directly producing unscientific research at research institutions,

              So you agree the second statement is not really about science.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I very clearly explained the strawman.

          Just because I pointed out that your argument is flawed doesn’t make me Maga or some kind of Trump supporter. It just means you made a bad argument.

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you’re going to ignore everything, I’ve already said, I see no reason to continue. You’re obviously arguing in bad faith, and I’m not going to enable that compulsion.

            • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              I have no horse in this race, topically speaking, but your continual return to name-calling (“Cheney Dems”, “Blue MAGA”) belies your attempt to come across as a good-faith participant in this discussion. There are people out there that think differently than you, and there always will be. Using pejoratives, reducing people you don’t know to mere “thought-terminating cliches”, is not conducive to civil discussion or persuasive dialectics.